Insolvency Administrator · 48/50
Follow money and assets. Can the bridge be reproduced from credit and interest through the EUR 400,000/locales component, bidding, adjudication, deed, cancellations, costs and surplus?
RECOVER → REVERSE → ACCOUNT → COMPENSATE → ATTRIBUTE RESPONSIBILITY
What must be proved and corrected to restore the lawful patrimonial position?
This hub does not infer wrongdoing from the outcome. It separates functions and directs readers to document-answerable questions for each accountability node.
Controlling principle: recovery first; accountability in service of recovery; punishment only where independently justified. See the full objectives →
Four layers, four recovery functions
Mercantile Court No. 1 / Judge · 48/50
Follow knowledge and decisions. For each patrimonial decision: what was actually before the court, what was decided, what remained outside scope, and what remedy can correct a continuing effect?
LAJ / court office · 46/50
Follow documents and finality. Request → decision → testimony/certification → service → delivery → external use → current effect. The three-level supervisory chain was registered on 15 August 2026.
Las Palmas Provincial Court · Section 4 · 45/50
Follow corrective capacity. RPL 2523/2025, 3304/2025 and 3319/2025 should be read by scope, transmitted record and available appellate remedy.
Related criminal routes: two files, two states
These routes are a secondary verification and possible-responsibility layer. They do not replace the patrimonial recovery priority and they must not be merged into one proceeding.
Admission / verification status requires updating
The located 12 July order gave the Public Prosecutor five days to report on admission in relation to DIP 2/2026. That procedural act does not establish definitive admission or proven facts.
See status and finite questions →Provisional dismissal
The latest controlled status is provisional dismissal communicated on 21 July 2026. It is not treated as free dismissal or a final merits determination. Any later reassessment would require legally material new evidence and a competent judicial decision.
See status, limits and new-evidence rule →One causal reconstruction, not four accusations
ADMINISTRATOR → JUDICIAL DECISION → LAJ/COURT-OFFICE INSTRUMENT → NOTARY/REGISTRY/IMPLEMENTATION → CURRENT PATRIMONIAL EFFECT → REMEDY
Every arrow is a proposition that must be proved. Multiple actors appearing in one chronology does not establish unlawful coordination.
Objective: restore assets and rights where a lawful route exists; account for fruits and income; compensate proven harm where restoration is impossible; attribute responsibility only according to demonstrated causal contribution.
Controlled minimum chronology
- 26 Jun 2018: partial suspension of realisation for identified properties because the appeal could materially affect the proposed dación.
- 22 Oct 2018: court-office testimony handling; complete content, service and external-use chain remains under reconstruction.
- 24 Oct 2019: later judicial control over a transaction carried out without prior authorisation and refusal of later validation.
- 2020–2022: quantification, bidding, CAM testimonies, adjudication and deed require documentary, judicial and accounting reconciliation.
- 9 Jul 2026: date set by the prior procedural order for study/vote/judgment in RPL 3304/2025.
- 15 Jul 2026: Order 223/2026 accumulated RPL 3319/2025 with 3304/2025 for joint decision.
- 21 Jul 2026: latest controlled DP 1956/2026 state: provisional dismissal.
Reading rule
Document in file ≠ judicial premise adopted · testimony issued ≠ improper use · adverse decision ≠ bias · provisional dismissal ≠ final merits conclusion · absence from our corpus ≠ non-existence · chronology ≠ causation.