1 · Preserve
Protect LPB, its causes of action and recoverable value; keep Matkator and third-party extra-insolvency rights separate where the evidence requires it.
RECOVERY FIRST · ACCOUNTABILITY IN SERVICE OF RECOVERY
Recover before punishing.
Project Sun Rock coordinates a portfolio of legally separate rights and recovery routes. One common history may affect several companies, operating structures, counterparties and other rights-holders without making them one claimant or placing every matter before one court.
Restitution where possible. Compensation where not. Each claim for its true owner, with its own authority, law, forum, causation and quantum.
Public status · 18 August 2026
The multi-claimant and multi-jurisdiction architecture is active. Identification, standing, authority, limitation and valuation for each third party remain subject to individual review. No aggregate third-party damages figure is published.
The question organising the whole programme
WHAT MUST BE PROVED → CORRECTED → RESTORED → ACCOUNTED FOR → COMPENSATED, AND FOR WHOM?
The work concerning the Insolvency Administrator, the Court, the LAJ/court office, private actors, regulators and public administrations is not a set of autonomous punitive ends. These are different nodes in one patrimonial reconstruction: what belonged to whom, what happened, through which mechanism, what consequence continues, which forum is competent and what remedy remains available.
Seven recovery objectives
2 · Restore
Recover property, title, possession, access, control, corporate rights and other interests for the correct holder where a lawful route exists.
3 · Reverse effects
Test continuing judicial, documentary, notarial, Registry, administrative and economic consequences of historic acts.
4 · Account
Reconstruct credit, interest, transactions, income, fruits, exploitation, costs and any surplus or displaced value.
5 · Damages
Quantify only causally provable loss: assets, fruits, income, investment value, financing effects and recoverable costs.
6 · Individual causation
Duty/power → verified knowledge → act/omission → implementation → consequence → remedy.
7 · Accountability by proof
Keep judicial remedy, civil/insolvency liability, discipline, inspection and criminal routes separate. None is presumed from another.
One common history does not create one claimant
“Sun Rock Group” describes a historical, economic and strategic reality built around the hotel, its operation, funding, commercialisation and recovery. It is not one legal person. Each entity or rights-holder retains its own assets, contracts, liabilities, causes of action, limitation periods, forum and recoveries.
Aweswell, LPB and Matkator
Aweswell pursues its own direct rights as parent, creditor, funder and investor where applicable. LPB retains its estate claims and Matkator its extra-insolvency rights. Group ownership does not automatically move a loss from one company to another.
Explotadora / CEXP / OpCo and others
Their existence, capacity, representation, current control, direct injury and standing must be verified separately before a claim is attributed to or pursued for them.
Owners, creditors and counterparties
Their rights remain with the person who suffered the loss unless a mandate, assignment, subrogation or another valid basis exists. Commercial proximity or common evidence does not make their claim Aweswell's property.
Prosecutors, regulators and administrations
Investigation, sanction, correction, confiscation or recovery of public money belongs to the competent body. Those functions are not Aweswell's private damages claims.
Authority to act for a third party is not presumed
Bases that may permit representation or control
- written mandate or engagement;
- valid assignment;
- subrogation;
- agency with sufficient authority;
- joinder, recognised representation or procedural mechanism;
- standing held by an administrator, liquidator or other office-holder;
- court permission or another basis under the applicable law.
What may be done while authority is pending
- preserve and organise the common evidence;
- invite the affected party to participate;
- fund or support an independent forensic assessment;
- coordinate properly instructed counsel where no conflict exists;
- pursue Aweswell's own direct loss arising from the same events.
Inactive does not mean abandoned
A party may have stopped communicating, lacked funding, changed management, lacked the complete evidence or considered litigation uneconomic. “Abandoned claim” will not be used without evidence of a release, settlement, discontinuance, final disposition or another equivalent legal effect.
Existence and control
Does the entity still exist? Who directs, liquidates or administers it?
Claim history
Was there a claim, settlement, release, assignment, discontinuance, insurance or subrogation?
Limitation and participation
Which period applies, was it interrupted, and does the rights-holder now wish to participate?
One factual matrix, several routes and several forums
Each proceeding has its own parties, object, standard and remedies. Coordination prevents contradiction and double recovery; it does not turn all routes into one cause.
Civil and contractual
Damages, debt, restitution, declarations, interim relief and contractual remedies.
Commercial and corporate
Governance, directors, shareholders, transfers, conflicts and structural modifications.
Insolvency
Estate, claims, liquidation, award, surplus, accounts and insolvency causes of action.
Criminal
Reports, evidence, investigation, victim participation and civil recovery where the law permits. Public prosecution remains controlled by the competent authority.
Regulatory and supervisory
Market integrity, investor information, regulated conduct, correction, sanction or referral.
Administrative and public-authority liability
Public acts, licences, tourism, tax, funds, transparency and individualised harm where the legal requirements are met.
Professional and disciplinary
Duties of lawyers, insolvency office-holders and other professionals before their competent bodies.
Tracing and enforcement
Preservation, recognition and recovery against assets or defendants lawfully reachable in the relevant jurisdiction.
Forensic claimant intake and liability management
No third party or amount enters the consolidated recovery dashboard until the following controls are completed—or expressly marked open:
- Identity and statusLegal name, identifier, jurisdiction, current existence and controlling person.
- Ownership and authorityDirect owner, insolvency office-holder, assignee, subrogated party, principal or disputed position.
- Direct injuryAsset, contract or interest affected; date; immediate and consequential loss; person who actually suffered it.
- Defendant and causationDuty or relationship → act or omission → knowledge → effect → claimant-specific loss.
- Law and forumJurisdictional gateway, clauses, asset location, insolvency exclusivity and enforcement.
- Limitation and procedural historyAccrual, knowledge, interruption, earlier proceedings, settlement, release, discontinuance and preclusion.
- Evidence and quantumPrimary documents, accounts, expert method, counterfactual, mitigation and confidence level.
- No duplication and conflictsReconcile asset, fruits, rent, profit, margin, shareholder loss, insurance, restitution and public compensation; control privilege, data and settlement authority.
Three nodes, three recovery functions
Insolvency Administrator · follow money and assets
Can the full bridge be reproduced from recognised credit through interest, the EUR 400,000/locales component, bidding, dación, cancellations, payments, costs and surplus?
Court / Judge · follow knowledge and decisions
What was actually before the court, what was decided, what remained outside scope, what consequence followed, and what route can correct a continuing effect?
LAJ / Court Office · follow documents and finality
Request → decision → certified content → finality → service → delivery → external use → current effect.
Three planes that must not be collapsed
Insolvency · LPB
Estate, assets, value, income, payments, causes of action, conclusion and restoration.
Extra-insolvency · Matkator / third parties
Property, title, possession, access, exploitation and fruits not automatically absorbed into LPB's estate.
Cross-border · Aweswell and other foreign interests
Investor/shareholder value, capital, financing, costs, contracts, direct losses and remedies crossing borders, without conflating them with LPB's estate.
What this strategy does not presume
Adverse outcome ≠ misconduct · judicial error ≠ prevarication · testimony issued ≠ improper use · chronology ≠ causation · missing document in our corpus ≠ non-existence · group label ≠ common legal identity, common intent or common claim ownership · commercial proximity ≠ representation · inactivity ≠ abandonment.
Por Derecho invites any affected person or institution to provide primary material that confirms, corrects or contradicts this reconstruction. The next phase is not another general trawl: it is a targeted claimant-by-claimant review of authority, law, forum, limitation, injury and quantum.
Connection to the Valencia banking claim
This dossier connects to the chronology, documents or rights considered in Aweswell v CaixaBank. The banking claim, credit chain and each actor’s conduct retain their separate scope. Read both litigation positions, then return to this dossier; no common liability is inferred.