DO NOW · evidence → knowledge → power → act → consequence
This page does not establish corruption, collusion or unlawful intent. It isolates document-answerable acts and omissions so the Insolvency Administrator's role can be professionally reviewed at the moments of greatest patrimonial consequence in Insolvency 36/2012. The linked 23 August 2026 criminal-lead record separately preserves Gil Marer's attributed approval, enablement, ratification or legally equivalent omission allegation; it is an allegation for investigation, not a finding.
From 23 August 2026, every analysis of an Administrator act or omission must pass through the 23 April 2025 removal application, both orders, RPL 3304/2025 + 3319/2025, the EUR 110,956.97 claim and RPL 421/2026, the 18 June 2026 complaint associated with handwritten daily intake reference 22, and the cross-evidence—without procedural merger—from DP 1901/2026, DP 1956/2026, DIP 80/2026 and relevant later acts.
Mercantile Court No. 1 suspended the realization process for a defined set of properties because, if the appeal succeeded, the conditions of the proposed transfer in payment to Construcciones Acosta Matos S.A. would be substantially different. The remaining rulings stayed unchanged and liquidation could continue for other estate assets.
The primary order already identified in the record documents an ob rem unlinking and sale carried out without prior judicial authorization and refuses later authorization or validation. The open question is what practical consequence that judicial control had for later acts.
The record should be reconstructed asset by asset: what information existed on title, LPB perimeter, Matkator/third-party assets, RIC, financing and exploitation before adjudication and transfer in payment, and what position the Administrator took in response.
The existence of two references does not permit them to be merged or one to be presented as confirmation of the other. Each has its own object, file and procedural status.
The located order of 12 July 2026 gave the Public Prosecutor five days to report on admission in relation to DIP 2/2026. At the latest published cut-off, no later signed decision had been located.
The latest controlled status is provisional dismissal communicated on 21 July 2026. It is not presented as a final merits determination. The dedicated page explains the legal distinction and the possible future relevance of genuinely new evidence, always subject to judicial decision.
Article 82 TRLC is a supervision and information power, not a clean-slate procedure. It permits the insolvency judge to require specific information or a report from the Insolvency Administrator. Article 83 separately provides that orders resolving questions concerning exercise of the office are not appealable and that the matter resolved may not then be raised by concursal incident.
For that reason, Por Derecho does not treat a broad Article 82 request as an automatic next step. Any use should be narrowly lawyer-validated for production, preservation, accounting or continuing estate protection and checked against the removal/appellate, DP 1956, qualification and separate responsibility routes.
Non-erasure rule. Later production, correction, restitution or improved accounting may reduce continuing harm and may be relevant evidence. It does not retroactively determine whether an earlier act or omission complied with duty, and it does not by itself establish or extinguish criminal, civil or insolvency responsibility.
Separate responsibility question. Documented use of an @es.gt.com account and the “Senior Advisor” description in Insolvency 36/2012 communications, together with the later commercial relationship acknowledged by Grant Thornton Spain and public Cuyás/GT professional presentation, makes it necessary to determine act by act whether any relevant conduct sat exclusively within the Administrator's personal sphere or within a collective professional perimeter.
No shared liability is attributed to Cuyás Abogados, Grant Thornton Canarias, Grant Thornton Spain or GTIL on those facts alone. The required test is: document → professional act → capacity → entity → authority/supervision → duty → damage → causation → applicable liability rule.
Open Cuyás Abogados / Grant Thornton Canarias · perimeter and potential responsibility →
The new controlled family registers the 28 December 2018 notice, burofax delivery to the Registry on 4 January 2019 at 11:58, the Registrar's response, the ob rem qualification and the 24 October order refusing convalidation. The 26 June continuation clause is a literal Administrator defence; it is not itself prior authority or removal of the unitary architecture. Open the actor–act–authority–effect analysis →
The Insolvency Administrator exercised statutory functions within a court-supervised process and could rely on the liquidation plan, judicial orders and information then available. Error, a disputed interpretation or even an act later found to lack prior authorization does not by itself prove corruption or concerted wrongdoing. Likewise, use of a brand, office or email domain does not itself establish professional-firm liability.
It does not establish crime, judicial wrongdoing, corruption, collusion, misappropriation or civil or criminal liability. Its narrower function is to fix a verifiable matrix of knowledge, power, act, professional capacity, judicial response and patrimonial consequence.
Correction invitation: any primary document that contradicts, completes or contextualizes this matrix should be added visibly.
The 22-page filing is now controlled separately with a public PDF viewer and a source-led forensic/prosecutorial analysis. It preserves the AC’s own propositions, admissions, inferences, incorporated screenshots, lawful explanations and open proof.
CANONICAL CONTROL · PD-AC-CLAIMS-R33-20260922-01
The allegations concerning Francisco de Borja Rodríguez-Batllori Laffitte are now connected by stable IDs. They are not fourteen findings of liability: each family preserves source, attributed allegation, contrary evidence, lawful explanation, causation/intent status and open proof. R33, signed 14 September 2026, is the latest response node and is tested proposition by proposition.
AC-CLM-001Annual accounts
AC-CLM-002SWAP / financial-risk contract
AC-CLM-003Assignment price / Art. 1535
AC-CLM-004Transfer in payment / ACTÚA / debt-value
AC-CLM-005Operating unity / 31 properties / €400,000
AC-CLM-0062018 access, security and material control
AC-CLM-007ONA / Clubotel funded exit
AC-CLM-008Fees, remuneration and estate funds
AC-CLM-009Opacity / conflict / Cuyás–Grant Thornton
AC-CLM-010Standing, personation and procedural access
AC-CLM-011Professional interference / isolation / attrition
AC-CLM-012Actor-specific criminal complaint / DP 1956
AC-CLM-013Final estate / assets / actions / cash
AC-CLM-014R33 / contested characterizations / narrative inversion
Open full machine register → · Canon and limits → · R33 · source and contrast → · AC-CLM-011 · professional continuity →