PROPERTY ≠ INSOLVENCY ESTATE · PROCEDURAL CONTINUITY ≠ MERITS FINDING

Matkator: DP 552/2025 → inhibition to Arrecife → DP 711/2025 → appeal still unresolved in the controlled record

The canonical source record identifies DP 552/2025 in La Laguna as the originating proceeding for the 20-Feb-2025 Matkator complaint and DP 711/2025 in Arrecife as the later continuation after territorial inhibition. The change of island and number must not be treated as a separate complaint without certified evidence of severance or new initiation.

Boundary. Filing, inhibition, provisional dismissal, reform and appeal are procedural facts to the extent stated below. They do not prove the alleged underlying offences, lawful or unlawful alteration of Matkator property, responsibility of any named person, civil nullity, or a final appellate outcome.

Controlled chain

20 February 2025 · La Laguna

Original Matkator complaint

Complaint concerning alleged unauthorised alteration, exclusion from and commercialisation of Matkator property within Sun Park / MYND Yaiza. Filing/content is documentary fact; underlying conduct remains allegation unless independently proved.

27 February 2025

Inhibition toward Arrecife

A later filed personation record states that JI nº2 La Laguna inhibited the matter to Arrecife on territorial-competence grounds. The signed native inhibition Auto remains a priority retrieval object.

12 March 2025 · Arrecife

Personation after transfer

The located record supports procedural continuity into the later Arrecife matter identified as DP 711/2025.

13 March 2025 · ETJ 163/2020

Criminal → civil-execution evidential bridge

A filing to JPI nº3 La Laguna informed ETJ 163/2020 of the criminal complaint/expansion and requested consequences concerning execution/auction validity, expert evidence and possible criminal prejudiciality. The filing proves what was requested, not that the execution court granted it.

17 March 2025 · DP 711/2025

Reported provisional dismissal

Later filed appellate material identifies a provisional-dismissal Auto of this date. Its signed text, exact reasoning and evidence before the court must be recovered before expanding its scope.

25 September / 3 October 2025

Reform denied; appeal filed

Later filed material reports denial of reform on 25 September and an appeal filed in October 2025. No signed Audiencia Provincial outcome is located in the controlled source set; therefore the route must not be described as finally closed or reopened.

Legal/evidential separation

Matkator

Extraconcursal property/title and alleged physical/commercialisation effects must be proved finca-by-finca.

LPB / Concurso 36/2012

Earlier estate-preservation/work/access evidence is relevant to chronology and notice but cannot be fused with Matkator's distinct 2025 complaint.

ETJ 163/2020

Existence of criminal proceedings does not automatically suspend or nullify civil execution. The signed ETJ response to each submission controls.

Current operation

HNT / Canarian Hospitality / MYND contracting, unit authority and room-level revenue require independent records; commercial operation does not itself decide title.

P0 source gaps

  1. Signed 27-Feb-2025 inhibition Auto and certified remisión DP552→DP711.
  2. Filed-stamped complaint/expansion package and annex inventory.
  3. Signed 17-Mar dismissal and 25-Sep reform-denial Autos.
  4. AP roll, filing receipt and current outcome for the October 2025 appeal.
  5. ETJ 163/2020 receipts and responsive orders on the criminal-material submissions.
  6. Full deed/Registry chain for fincas 8497, 8498, 8584 and 8588.
  7. Independent physical/Registry/Cadastre mapping and room-level authority/revenue records.

Canonical continuity control →