Documented chain
Ministry → information request → TSJC Government Secretariat → assessment pending → future resolution.
FIRST-LEVEL ARCHIVE → HIERARCHICAL APPEAL FILED
Government File 38/2026: the hierarchical appeal has been filed and registered.
On 20 August 2026, the appeal directed to the Secretary-General of the Administration of Justice was filed electronically through the Government Secretariat of the Canary Islands High Court.
Filed · receipt verified · forwarding and admission pending
Proof of filing. REGAGE registered the appeal as REGAGE26e00074355631 at 16:45:40 on 20 August 2026, addressed to DIR3 J00023418. The receipt identifies the submitted PDF and its exact SHA-512.
24 SEPTEMBER 2026 · NATIONAL/TERRITORIAL CONNECTION
108-2026 identifies an information request to the TSJC Government Secretariat.
The Ministry letter reports that information was requested before a decision. It makes the national/territorial connection traceable without stating that Government File 38/2026 reopened, its appeal was allowed, or the TSJC has already replied.
Production still needed
Ministry request, reference/scope, and any TSJC response/attachments.
Open verified PDF viewer →CGPJ · Appeal 286/2026 →DP 1901/2026 · documentary context →
Boundary: the letter does not print REGAGE26e00082058165, Ref.21, Ref.22, Ref.24 or the request content.
Verified data
Electronic registration and integrity control
| REGAGE number | REGAGE26e00074355631 |
|---|---|
| Presentation | 20/08/2026 · 16:45:36 |
| Registration | 20/08/2026 · 16:45:40 |
| Recipient | J00023418 · Government Secretariat of the Canary Islands High Court |
| Subject | Recurso de alzada Exp. Gub. 38/2026 - TSJ Canarias - LAJ/Oficina Judicial |
| Submitted document | RECURSO_ALZADA_EXP_GUB_38_2026_GIL_MARER_20AGO2026_PARA_FIRMA_Y_REGISTRO.pdf |
| Appeal SHA-512 | 5d64b77eb5e11dc0c1a0de16929db0975b74e760e751356245eeca12eaba4f9f58e3ca68f712f806e6b413d98570ae1e736153b697fafdcfdf0377d83e8a5c6c |
| Native receipt SHA-256 | a8ad2de721587b0b6554ca4e5aea8043c48eb919fe26b6f1e10d21c087895b1c |
The receipt proves presentation, destination, timestamp, subject and submitted file. It does not prejudge admission, actual forwarding to the superior authority or the appeal outcome.
Appeal relief
What has now been formally requested
Complete file
Forwarding to the Secretary-General with the issuing authority's report and a complete, ordered and indexed copy of Government File 38/2026.
Complete email chain
Literal incorporation of the notice, signed decision, appellant's reply with links and images, and the Government Secretary's follow-up response.
ATLANTE and preservation
Preservation of physical and electronic traceability and certification of the scope of the institutional ATLANTE statement.
CGPJ ↔ TSJ
An institutional request to the Permanent Commission, through the Appeals Section and expressly linked to Appeal 286/2026 / DI 169/2026, to reconcile dispatch, channel, delivery, receipt and registration.
Separation of functions
Separate treatment of LAJ/Office services, production within the insolvency proceeding, inter-institutional transmission and matters requiring referral elsewhere.
Individual reasoning
An express and reasoned decision on every refused measure, excluded document, partial referral or confirmation of archive.
Boundary. The appeal does not ask the Secretary-General to determine the CGPJ disciplinary issue, review the merits of judicial decisions or declare the responsibility of any individual or professional firm. It asks for preservation, production, coordination, traceability and reasoned allocation within each body's competence.
Controlled procedural status
What changed and what remains pending
First-level archive
Appeal filed
Forwarding pending
Decision pending
Next verifiable events. Complete incorporation into File 38/2026; forwarding with report and ordered file; superior-level reference; access to the index; CGPJ→TSJ reconciliation; decision on ATLANTE and preservation; and express appeal decision.
The record does not yet state that the appeal has been admitted, forwarded, reviewed or allowed. Nor does it state that the CGPJ has received or considered the requested inter-institutional measure.
Privacy and source
The native receipt is not published unredacted
The REGAGE receipt contains repeated personal identifiers and a residential address. The public repository retains only institutional metadata, subject, submitted filename and cryptographic hashes. The native PDF remains preserved in the private evidence corpus.
Evidential rule: registered filing ≠ admission · admission ≠ complete forwarding · forwarding ≠ substantive review · review ≠ allowance.