ACH · SUE · Verifiability · Wigmore
Competing hypotheses, statement–evidence consistency, checkability and evidence graphs.
PD-TRUTH-METHOD-20260925-02 · PD-CONTEXT-INTEGRITY-20260924-01
Truth Machine: document, language, context and network
A recursive forensic architecture that treats each sentence as a testable proposition inside its source, context, actor, capacity, chronology, proceeding, financial flow and evidential lineage.
Data-driven interface · refreshes every 60 seconds · methodology date: 2026-09-25
Not a lie detector. Linguistic features and network patterns generate review questions. Falsity, intent and liability require sources, context, contrary evidence and human review.
Architecture
01 · Preserve
Bytes, hash, version, custody, OCR/transcription.
02 · Decompose
Source → block → proposition, without losing the whole.
03 · Process language
Literal fidelity, modality, quantifiers, attribution, time, causation, context.
04 · Interconnect
Actor, capacity, proceeding, money, reuse and beneficiary.
05 · Challenge
Contrary evidence, lawful alternative, decisive test.
06 · Recurse
New source → dependencies → changed/no-change → rerun.
Live demonstration: R33
The fallback is a 1920×1080 vector SVG; with JavaScript, the visual is rebuilt from the current aggregate JSON.
Linguistic processing
L01 · Literal fidelityquote · negation · exception · qualifier
Scientific / economic-crime method stack
These methods do different jobs. None authorises an automatic lie score.
FATF · FCA · PSFA
Money tracing, expected-control evidence, source quality, networks and red-team analysis.
Falsehood / truth-inversion register
Promotion firewall. Literal falsity, misleading inference, knowledge, intent, actual reliance and legal liability are separate questions. Knowingly false requires a supported false/misleading state plus separate actor-specific knowledge evidence.
EXACT WORDSUNDERLYING FACTINVITED INFERENCECONTEXT EFFECTFALSE / MISLEADING?KNOWLEDGEINTENTMATERIALITY
Agency and forensic-practice lenses
Transferable principles from public sources; no claim that those institutions adopt or endorse Por Derecho.
Recursive priority queue
| # | Document / packet | State | Next action |
|---|
Anti-fragmentation graph
ORIGINAUTHORITYACTORCAPACITYACT/OMISSIONDOCUMENTPROCEEDINGTREATMENTCONSEQUENCEREUSEBENEFICIARYCONTRADICTIONOPEN QUESTIONSOURCE
A thematic relationship does not transfer knowledge, intent, control or liability. Every graph edge requires its own source bridge.