Native document, hashes, dates, provenance and clear source limitations.
Verified as a document or source reference, not proven underlying allegations.
PUBLIC METHOD · 30 OCTOBER 2026
How a criminal attribution question is tested
An interactive public-safe model of source, actor, dated capacity, conduct, knowledge, causation, contrary evidence and legal sufficiency. The graphic does not allege that the connected categories establish criminal participation.
Important distinction. The broader Por Derecho investigation and its confidential records remain private. This page explains how questions are tested; it is not an accusation map, legal verdict, finding of collusion or confirmation that every digital source has been searched.
22R33 source pages in flagship review
276source propositions scanned in historic review
482review anchors preserved
0automatic source-complete legal signoffs
The evidence-to-elements graph
Select a stage to read its required proof and its strongest check. No named person is criminally classified by this graphic.
DOCUMENT → ELEMENTCONTRARY → REVIEWNO GUILT SCORE
01 / 09
Source
Identify the exact original, date, signature, chain of custody and completeness limits. A repeated quotation is not independent corroboration.
Independent status dimensions
One status does not upgrade another. A priority flag cannot establish wrongdoing.
A specified actor, event-date offence, objective act, required mental element and causation must all be tested.
Unresolved, contradicted or not established until element-specific evidence exists.
Owner-controlled urgency independent of evidence quality or court deadlines.
P0 identifies urgent preservation and review, never criminal guilt.
Recursive review, not a lie detector
SOURCEACT + TIMECAPACITYKNOWLEDGELAWCAUSATIONCONTRARYHUMAN REVIEW
Source → event → person and legal capacity → knowledge at the time → act and reliance → harm and alternative cause → contrary record → lawful review. If an original changes, dependent propositions reopen.
Existing published R33 research
These current public records provide the fuller source-aware methodology and preserve adverse qualifications.
No private case graph, internal email, unredacted source, witness information or live legal strategy is published on this page. Public content remains distinct from owner-restricted investigation records.