DP 1901/2026 · private and extraconcursal core

Matkator and the extraconcursal core: unit, room, income, beneficiary.

LPB was the insolvent debtor. Matkator was not. Aweswell retains a separate direct-rights lane that must be distinguished from merely reflective shareholder loss. A generic reference to Insolvency 36/2012 cannot supply title, consent, access, works, operation, unit-room mapping, income entitlement or beneficiary authority over non-estate assets and rights.

See the finite matrix What DP 1901 must investigate

The matrix the insolvency cannot absorb

A hotel may look like one economic unit; title must be proved component by component.

The public route should not start from the current existence of MYND Yaiza and retro-validate everything before it. It must reconstruct each jump with native document, date, author, authority, affected property and effect produced.

Verification chain.unit → title → authority → access → works → current room/facility → operator/PMS → income → accounting → beneficiary

Layer	Necessary verification	Why it matters
Title	Historic and current registered holder, charges, entries, transfer document or absence of transfer.	LPB liquidation could not by itself transfer non-LPB properties.
Authority	Contract, corporate consent, power, valid resolution, applicable court or administrative decision.	Credit, Community vote, keys or security do not replace property-by-property title.
Access and works	Who ordered security, locks, entry, measurements, project, licence, contracting, execution and payment.	Material control can affect extraconcursal rights even when presented as an insolvency incident.
Operation	Hotel inventory, current room, PMS, reservations, contracts, operator, receiving account and accounting.	Hotel operation turns a title question into a fruits, income and beneficiary question.
Public authority	IBI/property tax, waste charges, collection, Cadastre, licences, first occupation, project, signatory and municipal effect.	Public systems can confirm or exclude administrative normalisation of non-estate assets.

DP 1901/2026

The private chain must leave abstraction.

This does not state that DP 1901/2026 has found liability. It identifies the control point where the private and extraconcursal hypothesis must be confirmed or excluded through primary sources.

01Limited positionA limited ownership, credit or Community position is not authority over all properties, rights or income.
02Apparent documentary authorityMinutes, census, vote, debt, certificates, offices, powers and Community banking must be checked at origin.
03Material controlSecurity, keys, locks, access, exclusion, measurements, pilots, projects and works.
04Whole-hotel presentationThe hotel is presented commercially, technically and financially as a complete project.
05Transfer and operationReconstruction of CAM-HNT, Canarian Hospitality/MYND, contracts, operator and inventory.
06MonetisationReservations, income, financing, incentives, value, accounts, accounting and final beneficiary.

Authorities and custodians

The proof is not only in a court file.

The hypothesis is administratively auditable. Yaiza, the Cabildo, Cadastre, Registry, tourism bodies, prosecution service, CNMV/RICPE and private operators hold different pieces of the same chain.

Yaiza as a public proof engineIBI/property tax, waste charges, collection, taxpayer, payer, Cadastre, licences, first occupation, projects, presenter, power, signatory, affected property, municipal verification and effect produced.

Prosecution / DP 1901Formal activity is not the same as material investigation. The fiscal report, corpus, instructions, review, remittance, receipt, later order and substantive treatment of Matkator, Community, access, works, operation, income and private actors must be identified.