1 · Claim / hypothesis
State the proposition narrowly: actor, capacity, act or omission, date, asset/right, causal effect and alleged benefit or injury.
ADVERSARIAL REVIEW · COMPETING HYPOTHESES · DECISIVE TESTS
Asset Recovery Situation Room
A current-GitHub analytical surface for asking what would change the recovery theory, what contrary evidence already exists, and which finite source could decide the next branch.
2 · Supporting record
List named source objects and distinguish primary record, actor representation, attributed allegation, inference and public-context source.
3 · Contrary record
Record lawful alternative explanations, adverse decisions, later corrective acts, source gaps and evidence that narrows or contradicts the proposition.
4 · Decisive test
Identify the smallest source or event capable of materially confirming, narrowing or falsifying the proposition.
Operational questions
Authority
Who actually had power over this asset, document, vote, account, filing, security measure, title step or public-funding decision?
Knowledge
What exactly reached the actor, when, in what form, and what contrary information was available?
Use and effect
Was the material relied on, ignored, corrected, transmitted or superseded? What measurable effect followed?
Recovery consequence
If the proposition is proved or disproved, which recovery route changes: title/control, income, restitution, damages, disclosure, preservation or institutional action?
Case Prism / Second Pair discipline: no hypothesis becomes a finding through repetition. Re-open when a decisive source arrives; preserve contrary material; record the human decision that changes status.
Continuity boundary: this is a GitHub-native functional successor. It does not copy GitLab’s rendered Situation Room, claim exact GitLab source recovery, or claim byte parity with unavailable GitLab source.