# Concurso 36/2012 — active-estate source provenance, 2017–2021

**Cut-off:** 23 August 2026  
**Public layer:** hashes, redacted substantive text and neutral source cards only  
**Private layer:** exact source binaries, signatures, verification codes, contact data and confidential material

## Source-status grammar

- **Holding:** what an official act decided.
- **Recital/observation:** what an official act reports or observes without necessarily deciding.
- **Party assertion:** a party's position, not an adjudicated fact.
- **Expert opinion:** the attributed opinion of the report author/commissioning side.
- **Open:** the needed source has not been located or authenticated in this corpus.

## Official-act cards

### `C36-JUD-2017-12-19-001` — liquidation opening

- **Source:** official electronic-copy derivative; uploaded alias SHA-256 `3f1a239121e213ee26e4abaaa7a50940107389117c7c7ba73d83e6f149cf49f1`, 3 pages. A cleaner canonical repository source exists under a different hash.
- **Holding:** opened LPB's liquidation after no convenio proposal was accepted; suspended LPB's powers over **its patrimony**; dissolved LPB; required a plan within fifteen days and quarterly reports; ordered publication/Registry measures.
- **Not decided:** ownership, possession or authority over the whole hotel, Matkator property, CAM property or other third-party units.
- **Missing:** service/finality/publication set and complete downstream quarterly-report run.
- **Transcript:** [full redacted substantive text](full-text/C36-JUD-2017-12-19-001-apertura-liquidacion-redacted.md).

### `C36-JUD-2018-04-16-001` — plan approval

- **Source:** seven-page highlighted scan derivative, SHA-256 `6a64515f3504762bc6f44747d64d61d9a7ec99e7367d6bd3ae9ade9ebe9eaacf`. The coloured highlights are later editorial marks, not court marks; a cleaner canonical repository source exists.
- **Holding:** approved the AC plan with FJ-II precisions; approved the listed mortgaged apartments route by dación; approved a separate EUR 400,000 direct-sale line for listed premises/pools; required auction-equivalent notice and a ten-day better-offer window; imposed quarterly reporting and opened the classification section.
- **Not decided:** that either competing valuation was proved; that the sale/dación was completed; that EUR 9.776m, EUR 7.097m or EUR 6.608m was judicially adopted; who later possessed the complex; or whether later implementation complied with every condition.
- **Missing:** the AC plan, all observations/annexes, the separate same-date clarification Auto, service/finality and complete implementation record.
- **Transcript:** [full redacted substantive text](full-text/C36-JUD-2018-04-16-001-plan-liquidacion-redacted.md).

### `MAT-005` — 12-May-2020 reposición

- **Source:** official electronic copy, SHA-256 `2caa1492433a74c603efedf9662ca1057eda863cadb81474cf05a8b7a5cfbbfa`, 2 pages.
- **Holding:** dismissed LPB's reposición and confirmed the 24-Oct-2019 Auto. The court treated the AP 23-Jul-2019 interest framework as res judicata and said final third-bidder amounts would follow party submissions on certificates.
- **Procedural limit:** demolition, damage-assessment, judicial-inspection and access allegations were rejected in this motion as new/extemporaneous requests. The Auto did not adjudicate whether demolition, damage or obstruction occurred or who was responsible.
- **Missing:** signed 24-Oct anchor, 4-Nov reposición and annexes, AP 23-Jul source/finality, certificates and final-amount order.
- **Transcript:** [full redacted substantive text](full-text/MAT-005-auto-12may2020-reposicion-redacted.md).

### `MAT-008` / `C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001` — preservation/inspection reposición

- **Source:** official electronic copy, SHA-256 `3b02a944ae5becb154bdc2109935d060de80bb9e862f10ab055582696e5ee40f`, 4 pages.
- **Holding:** partially allowed Aweswell's reposición only to replace the sparse reasoning; maintained denial of filing 7,299's requested inspection/expert measures.
- **Court observations:** photographs did not allow the court to identify whether pictured apartment interiors belonged to LPB or CAM; it viewed common-area rubble as aesthetic/removable; it considered a court inspection and court-appointed valuation unhelpful in the liquidation posture.
- **Not decided:** a global absence of damage; a complete unit-by-unit ownership map; responsibility for every work; whether access was actually granted; or the merits of a later responsibility action. The Auto itself noted that such a request might make sense in a possible responsibility action against CAM or the AC.
- **Missing:** filing 7,299 annex, Providencia, complete reposición/DIOR, AC/CAM annexes/certificates, service/finality and later responsibility/outcome chain.
- **Transcript:** [full redacted substantive text](full-text/C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001-preservacion-inspeccion-redacted.md).

### `C36-JUD-2021-02-24-002` — liquidation extension

- **Source:** two-page rendered official copy, SHA-256 `9841c9aa91e2fa0cf49eeff249928b0ac66dc54912853e77b83d9b1b73bbd27d`.
- **Holding:** granted a one-year extension from 24-Feb-2021 and required a reasoned further request if still unfinished.
- **Reasoning/limit:** the court cited known difficulties and anticipated delay of nullity actions **to be brought** against Bankia. It did not find Bankia liable, determine such an action's merits or say “swap.” LPB and Aweswell had consented to the extension request.
- **Missing:** 4-Feb-2020 Providencia, AC applications, responses, service/reposición/finality, later extensions, actual close-out and any Bankia action/outcome.
- **Transcript:** [full redacted substantive text](full-text/C36-JUD-2021-02-24-002-prorroga-liquidacion-redacted.md).

## Party/expert/private source cards

### `C36-PTY-2019-01-16-001` — opposition to reported liquidation operations

- **What it is:** signed party pleading dated 16-Jan and electronically signed 17-Jan-2019, SHA-256 `fde56be1cb8d95adac76162ca210de457d95cc6c69fb449c5745ad7fc122bb0c`, 9 pages.
- **Source-within-source:** quotes the AC's fourth report as describing a 28-Nov-2018 deed, EUR 400,000 receipt, AC remuneration payment after cheque clearance and contact with other estate creditors.
- **Party allegations:** unlawful severance/sale, ob-rem concealment, delivery of possession and improper favour. These are not holdings.
- **Contrary/limiting material:** the 16-Apr Auto authorised the EUR 400,000 route subject to conditions; the pleading acknowledges a 12-Dec-2018 Diligencia it says authorised the sale but was challenged; the exact scope of the 26-Jun suspension requires source reconciliation.
- **Open:** fourth report, deed 2,150, cheque/ledger, 12-Dec act, challenge/outcome, Registry and court treatment of this filing.

### `MAT-006`, `MAT-007` and `MAT-007-ALT-01` — 2020–2021 opposing pleadings

- **Aweswell position:** requested estate-condition inspection/preservation measures and relied on photographs; its cited annex is missing.
- **CAM position:** asserted ownership of 54 apartments, works limited to its units under a licence and Community-authorised safety/security measures; its cited certification is missing.
- **Variant rule:** `MAT-007-ALT-01` is a facsimile/print variant of the same CAM opposition; it is not a second position or corroborating source.
- **Outcome:** read both with `MAT-008`; the order preserved the denial after supplying fuller reasoning.

### `MAT-009` — expert-access email print

- **What the rendered print purports to record narrowly:** a request/notice and an AC proposal for a videoconference response.
- **What it does not prove:** native authenticity/headers, complete attachments, authority/refusal, an actual access event or an expert result.
- **Public treatment:** chronology only. Native RFC822, attachment and outcome remain `ME-PDFSCAN-012`.

### `C36-EXW-DRAFT-2018-05-10-VALUATION-REASONABLENESS`

- **What it is:** 26-page commissioned expert draft, SHA-256 `ccf1d76f6791ce47e0af02162df5317f786a8ad6ec08c50784a83fabf52911a4`; marked strictly private/confidential and draft/subject to changes; no visible signature or filing stamp.
- **Attributed opinion:** questions the AC/CAM valuation/offer route and compares Actúa, Gesvalt, Tinsa and AC figures.
- **Controls:** contains an internal EUR 450 Gesvalt conflict; a debt-footnote arithmetic inconsistency; unreconciled CAM figures/date references; and an overreading of the 16-Apr Auto as accepting Actúa's security value.
- **Public treatment:** metadata/limitations only. No full text or raw PDF without final-version identification and privilege, confidentiality, copyright and authority review.

### `VAL-ORD1859-2023-EX07-LA-CAJA-2008-RECEIPTS`

- **What it is:** ten-page 2008 bank/interest-coverage receipt exhibit, SHA-256 `0ae57307cc5b73bfaac351d808e5c8801881dcd177d3c0fae5bd1e390183652d`; likely an exhibit in Valencia ORD 1859/2023, but the parent filing/index is absent.
- **Narrow support:** contemporaneous interaction between a EUR 1,277.77 hedge settlement and loan-interest servicing in the displayed July–November 2008 slice.
- **Not established:** contract linkage, mis-selling/nullity, total loss, default cause, 2012 acceleration, insolvency causation or liquidation value.
- **Public treatment:** hash-only/private because the pages expose full account and tax identifiers.

## Duplicate/alias controls

- `Juicio Desahucio por Precario 1240-2011.pdf` = exact `TS-04` binary; canonical proceeding JV 1260/2011.
- The two supplied 1-Mar-2018 photo PDFs = one exact binary/documentary item.
- Two CAM February-2021 PDFs = one pleading plus one facsimile variant.
- Editorial filename labels and unnecessary private-person identities remain in private custody. The public machine manifest uses neutral aliases and never treats a filename as a finding.

## Controlling gaps

The operative finite requests are `ME-PDFSCAN-001`–`ME-PDFSCAN-031` in the 28-upload source control. Missing evidence is an acquisition target, not evidence of non-existence or wrongdoing.