# Ministerio Fiscal — outstanding shortcomings / production matrix after DP 1901 order

**Control date:** 18 September 2026  
**Use:** E.G. 745 successor, DP 1901 provenance, public accountability and future evidence production.  
**Rule:** adverse institutional posture is attributed; responsibility remains actor-specific and source-led.

| Lane | Documented issue | What is now known | What remains missing | Finite next production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI 248/2018 | Archive of allegations against AC/CAM while Calificación Fiscal position was developing | Signed archive and prior Fiscal opinion are controlled | Complete file, requested-vs-performed diligences, source inventory, what was actually consulted | Certified DI 248 file + evidence matrix |
| Calificación 2019 / hearing 2023 | Adverse Fiscal opinion; later hearing attendance | 2019 signatory documented; institutional hearing attendance documented; Gil directly identifies Ricardo at hearing | Official appearance/allocation, audiovisual/transcript, exact oral position, evidence before Fiscal | Certified hearing record + allocation + audiovisual/transcript |
| DI 113/2022 | Allegations concerning 7-Jun control, works, value and ownership representations treated through judicialised/civil-insolvency frame | Signed archive/2026 copy decision controlled | Complete file, remissions, diligences and receiving-court bridge | Certified DI 113 file/index + remittance log |
| DI 22/2026 | Recurrent joinder/continued archive; later material treated as judicialised | Multiple signed acts and later office acts controlled | Full source-by-source treatment, assignment, every remission and receipt | Complete DI 22 file + routing matrix |
| DIP 2/2026 | Archive used a 2-Mar ATLANTE no-appeal premise; later appeal record exists | **Available corpus now fully digitised:** 13-Jan complaint, 8-Feb amplification, signed 6-Mar decree, signed 9-Mar notice, 11-Mar update and REGAGE26e00026303869. Later RPL 3319/2025 / 3304/2025 record confirms the appeal architecture. | Separate 11-Feb opening decree; complete certified file/index; exactly what ATLANTE displayed on 2 Mar; incorporation/access/treatment of the 11-Mar correction; what DIP2 material travelled into DP1901 | Certified DIP2 file + 11-Feb decree + post-correction handling/transmission record; use DIP2 error ledger |
| DP 1901/2026 | Fiscal intervention previously unknown; procedural identity collision | **14-Sep order records 29-Jul Fiscal report seeking archive; complete three-page order is publicly transcribed. June/July source closure now proves separate judge/private-actor filings and proves private-actor amplification material was physically tendered under DP 1901/Plaza 6 on 9 Jul.** | Signed report, author, corpus, assignment, reasoning, instruction/visado; native/certified Auto and legal-notice metadata; exact initiating document; certified daily-reference-21 / daily-reference-24 reparto and 18-Jun–12-Jul ingestion history; direction of collision | D38 + certified docket/index/reparto + native Auto/notice record + `evidence/judicial/dp-1901-2026/PROCEDURAL_IDENTITY_SOURCE_CLOSURE_18SEP2026.md` |
| E.G. 745/2026 | Inspection archive says no concrete irregularity by a particular Fiscal in a particular matter | Original source named six proceedings; DP1901 now contains a concrete dated Fiscal act | Full E.G. 745 file, source corpus actually examined, routing of 20/21-Aug materials, request-by-request treatment | Reposicion successor + complete file/access/preservation |
| Central routing | Separate central acknowledgements exist | Receipt is documented for identified communications | Whether/when each item reached competent unit and decision-maker | sender→receiver→file→handler→decision chain |
| Actor-specific accountability | Institution-level chronology is broader than proved personal knowledge | Several signatories already fixed by source | Who knew what, when, under what duty, with what lawful explanation and effect | actor-by-actor act/duty/knowledge/counterfactual matrix |
| Preservation | Repeated requests identify finite records | Need for preservation is documented | Whether preservation occurred; retention/deletion history where lawful | bounded preservation acknowledgement / search-and-custody record |

## Source controls added 18 September

- `evidence/fiscalia/2026/DIP2_INACCURACY_ANALYTICAL_ERROR_LEDGER_18SEP2026.md`
- `evidence/fiscalia/dip-2-2026/README.md` and its six located source records
- `evidence/judicial/dp-1901-2026/full-text/auto-14sep2026-public-transcription.md`
- `archive/FISCALIA_DIP2_DP1901_FULL_DIGITISATION_CONTROL_18SEP2026.md`

## Controlled conclusion

The 29 July DP 1901 archive request is significant because it converts one formerly open node into a dated prosecutorial act. It does not eliminate the need to prove author, knowledge, reasoning, corpus, causal effect and lawful alternative. It should be read together with — not used to blur — the older DI 248, DI 113, DI 22, DIP 2 and Calificación records.