<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Material updates — Project Sun Rock</title>
  <subtitle>The feed update and 25 October 2026 entry use an editorial calendar date: 00:00:00Z is not an observed publication, presentation or registration time. Earlier entries retain their original metadata and dated verification scope.</subtitle>
  <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Project Sun Rock</name></author>
<!-- PD-MAD-CTBG-20261025 BEGIN -->
  <entry><title>Madrid / CTBG: registered supplements and Gil Marer’s recovery account</title><id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#madrid-ctbg-25oct</id><link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/regional-incentives-gc836-p06/#october-2026-source-reconciliation"/><published>2026-10-25T00:00:00Z</published><updated>2026-10-25T00:00:00Z</updated><summary>In the registered Madrid and CTBG supplements of 25 October, Gil Marer reports later recovery of five document categories and a later CSV-bearing report, and sets out his copy-correction account. The submissions preserve April–June contrary evidence and qualify grant ownership/timing and personal attribution. Receipt verification does not independently establish the reported recovery history or text/visual copy equivalence. NO DESISTO remains. Receipt and attachment identity are verified; admission, investigation, complete access and criminal responsibility are not established. Date precision: the Atom published/updated value 2026-10-25T00:00:00Z is an editorial calendar-date marker, not an observed publication, presentation or registration time. It does not convert the receipts’ literal times to UTC.</summary></entry>
<!-- PD-MAD-CTBG-20261025 END -->
  <entry>
    <title>Cuatrecasas / ETJ 163 / DP 748: civil suspension refused, criminal appeal processing verified</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#cuatrecasas-etj-dp748-18sep</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/cuatrecasas-etj163-dp748-18-september-2026/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/proceedings/tf-civ-002/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/proceedings/tf-cri-003/"/>
    <published>2026-09-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>On 16 September the DP 748 LAJ ordered origin-court processing of the subsidiary appeal and gave the Ministerio Fiscal five days for submissions. On 17 September the ETJ judge dismissed Matkator's reconsideration application against refusal to suspend execution and stated that no appeal lies; the order was received on 18 September. The civil order does not decide DP 748, criminal liability, assignee identity or completed adjudication/cession. Publicly authorised next steps include Article 215.2 complement analysis regarding separately pleaded subsidiary irreversible-act relief, placing the new order into DP 748 as supervening material, obtaining remate/cession traceability, and preparing a separate preservation / actual-notice communication to Cuatrecasas. No third party is accused merely by considering or receiving a cession.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AEAT / Pink diligence of 6 April 2022: complete source, attribution and limits</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#aeat-pink-diligence-6april2022</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/evidence/aeat-customs-surveillance-sun-park-diligence-6april2022/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/evidence/aeat/pink/2022-04-06-vigilancia-aduanera/public-pdfs/diligencia-aeat-vigilancia-aduanera-sun-park-6abril2022-public-redacted.pdf"/>
    <published>2026-08-28T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-28T18:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The complete five-page diligence concerning the 22 March 2022 Customs Surveillance visit, formalised on 6 April, is published with a raster public copy, transcription, translation and proposition matrix. It proves the direct observations and that specified accounts were recorded; it does not itself prove their truth, the male interlocutor’s identity, legal replacement of the Operating Community, or who comprehensively operated or earned Sun Park income during 2017–2018. The visit could not have originated the 2020 inspection or March 2022 extension decision; any influence on the later assessment remains open.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unitary attributed economic-criminal theory and Phase-A analysis of the received manifest</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#continuing-enterprise-rdm-manifest-26aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/unitary-criminal-evidence-map/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/unitary-criminal-reverse-engineering/"/>
    <published>2026-08-26T06:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-26T06:30:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Attributed criminal theory; not a judicial finding. Gil Marer and Aweswell allege one continuing economic-criminal enterprise, advanced through successive adoption and divided functions. The theory does not itself prove a statutory criminal organisation or group under Criminal Code Articles 570 bis or 570 ter, an original pact, any person’s participation or guilt; each actor and each offence require separate proof. This is only a factual allegation of connection: it does not characterise the conduct as a continuing or permanent offence or alter completion, any participation window or limitation period for any specific offence. The received workbook is a manifest or index for public-safe Phase-A triage — approximately 10.6 thousand email-index rows, 9.0 thousand attachment rows and 4.3 thousand threads — not the originals. ALG-ENT-018 is independent and not inferred from the workbook; the manifest changes discovery priority only and adds no evidential support until originals are acquired, preserved, authenticated and tested against contrary material. The 24 August sentence remains a historical, source-bounded, non-controlling assessment and does not decide unexamined originals.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ICAM / CCACM: institutional record strengthened and no-response rule applied</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#icam-ccacm-institutional-control-25aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/cuatrecasas-icam-ccacm-2026/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/institutional-records-bar-bodies-2026/"/>
    <published>2026-08-25T19:34:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-25T19:34:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The existing dedicated route separates individual conduct, partner authorisation or supervision and professional-firm controls, while presenting the strongest defence and eight questions also capable of exonerating. The two 25 August RECIBIDO messages prove receipt only. No final decision or CCACM number for the second appeal has been located, and no new response was sent without a procedural trigger.</summary>
  </entry>
    <entry>
    <title>David Espejo / eXW: updated provenance and judicial-use matrix</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/david-espejo-expert-evidence/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/david-espejo-expert-evidence/"/>
    <updated>2026-08-25T18:30:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Four signed reports, two identified annexes and a pre-hearing version issue, with express evidential limits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Declaration 011 and OSINT: Campanario, Prieto Puente, López Noriega and the corporate network</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#campanario-osint-declaration011-25aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/alvaro-campanario-prieto-puente-lopez-noriega/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/archive/declarations/011_WITNESS_GIL_PERIMETER_CAMPANARIO_PRIETO_NORIEGA_COMMUNITY_NETWORK_20260825.md"/>
    <published>2026-08-25T08:33:01Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-25T08:33:01Z</updated>
    <summary>The bilingual dossier publishes the bounded “around 2000” trace for Álvaro Campanario Hernández; the registered Prieto Puente–López Noriega–Millan and Miners and Prieto Puente–Antonio Cogolludo–Santa Lucia relationships; and bounded capacities in Pamalexsha and Noalpa. Declaration 011 remains registered, derived from voice/dictation, and not signed, sworn or ratified word for word. Corrections, AP 89/2014 as contrary evidence and eleven future actions are visible. Only the aggregate 2,413-message mirrored subset is published; the complete mailbox has not been acquired and the private address, message bodies, subjects, participants and provider identifiers are excluded.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DIP 2/2026: judicial complaint and amplification published with separate traceability</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#dip2-judicial-complaint-25aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/fiscalia-dip-2-2026/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/evidence/judicial-governance/decanato-reference-24/public-pdfs/denuncia-magistrado-18jun2026-public-redacted.pdf"/>
    <published>2026-08-25T08:13:23Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-25T08:13:23Z</updated>
    <summary>The dossier publishes the DIP 2/2026 notice and Decree with a reading notebook; the stamped copy and complete principal pleading signed on 17 and presented on 18 June; and the complete 25 June amplification, with page-accounted transcriptions. Daily reference no. 24 is a material registry link, not a NIG or confirmed proceeding. The Decanato route, CGPJ communication and Appeal 286/2026 remain separate. Links between private actors, the insolvency administrator and the Judge, and the call for an independent audit of the Acosta Matos perimeter, are published as attributed allegations—not proof of capture, collusion, prevaricación or criminal responsibility.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Valencia hearing chronology corrected from the signed court record</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#valencia-hearing-chronology-24aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/caixabank-valencia-claim/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/lender-of-record/"/>
    <published>2026-08-24T22:07:04Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-24T22:07:04Z</updated>
    <summary>The original 6 November 2025 10:00 hearing did not proceed after the opposing expert reported a cancelled flight on the evening before. Aweswell did not oppose suspension because it wished to question him personally. The signed 6 November diligence relisted the hearing for 28 January 2027 at 10:00. The former October 2026 / 12:00 repository entry was an unsupported transcription, not a second postponement. The short-notice event establishes neither tactical delay nor anything about the merits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cuatrecasas: Stoneweg/Varia package and perimeter-wide billing continuation synchronized</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#cuatrecasas-package-billing-24aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/cuatrecasas-sun-park/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ona-hotels-insolvency-exit-36-2012/"/>
    <published>2026-08-24T10:38:46Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-24T10:38:46Z</updated>
    <summary>Stoneweg's own 12 June email issued an Oferta Vinculante Condicionada after the agreed call and for the next day's judicial meeting. The offer stage was agreed and closed; completion and drawdown remained conditional. The Elaia/Lagune EUR 26m route is presented through reciprocal documented components. The Cuatrecasas, ONA and 7 June pages are synchronized and cross-linked. A 2014-to-present billing/email continuation protocol is preserved in the repository; private ledgers and unsent correspondence remain outside it, and no communication is authorised for transmission without fresh exact approval.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RPL 2523/2025: note on judicial independence, procedural status and reservation of actions</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/es/nota-independencia-judicial-estado-procesal-reserva-acciones/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/es/nota-independencia-judicial-estado-procesal-reserva-acciones/" hreflang="es"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/insolvency-36-2012-ap-section-4/"/>
    <published>2026-08-23T23:14:43Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-23T23:14:43Z</updated>
    <summary>A Spanish-language note states that the website is not a communication to the Court, seeks no predetermined outcome and introduces no extra-record material. It corrects RPL 2523/2025 as the culpability appeal against Judgment 163/2023. The 11 May decision identifies four appellants and scheduled deliberation for 4 June; no later decision has yet been located in the available corpus. The reservation is limited to remedies and actions under law and keeps the appeal separate from criminal, civil, regulatory and disciplinary routes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CAM creditor control: direct-instruction and institutional-omission criminal lead</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#cam-creditor-control-criminal-lead-23aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/cam-creditor-control-shadow-administration-judicial-omission/"/>
    <published>2026-08-23T00:25:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-23T00:25:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Gil Marer and Aweswell allege direct CAM-perimeter instruction or coordination of the 7 June 2018 operation, knowing approval/enablement/ratification or legally equivalent omission by the insolvency administrator, and judicial acts requiring examination under Criminal Code Articles 446–449. The multi-source record supports making and investigating the allegations, not treating them as findings. The 2018 provisional dismissal and appeal, the administrator's denial and narrower-authority account, valid potential CAM credit/unit title and the requirement for actor-specific proof concerning Laura Patricia Acosta Matos remain prominent.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pamanil / Pink / CEXP / AEAT: controlling corrections published</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#gil-pamanil-pink-aeat-22aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#gil-pamanil-pink-aeat-22aug"/>
    <published>2026-08-22T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-22T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Gil's criminal-purpose allegation concerning Pamanil is preserved as an attributed allegation and must be tested act by act; observable acts do not prove integrated maintenance or innocence. Gil states the asserted authority chain as owners to the Owners' Community acting lawfully to CEXP; “all owners” denotes the universe entitled to participate, not documentary unanimity. The facial 22-May-2017 Pink-to-LPB access-key instrument supersedes the literal no-key proposition, while Gil maintains no CEXP master set and no lawful whole-hotel transfer authority. His primary Pink-contract position is total voidness ab initio, not adjudicated. AEAT began before the 2022 Acosta statements and relied on multiple sources; Laura is named, the male is not. AP 89/2014 / Rollo 793/2012 corrects the former duplicate AP 16/2014 label.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CEXP / Monterecco-Pink / Order 804: continuity and source access corrected</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#operator-auto804-continuity-closeout</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#operator-auto804-continuity-closeout"/>
    <published>2026-08-20T16:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-20T16:50:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The 13 August forensic review and correction are recoverable through a public-safe continuity record and a private recovery checkpoint. CEXP retains the strongest located collective provenance without proved exclusivity; the 1 February 2012 notice, real 159-unit/477-bed operation and authority/scope gaps are confronted. Order 804/2018 remains an appellate affirmation of provisional criminal dismissal and adverse evidence, not a title trial or proof of total abandonment. Drive links are custody locators whose anonymous access has not been verified. Cabildo/RGT/Yaiza remain bounded document requests without a predetermined conclusion.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>JDAM / architecture / COALZ–COAGC: the visado as a documentary node in a wider chain</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/architecture-documentary-node-jdam/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/architecture-documentary-node-jdam/"/>
    <published>2026-08-20T16:20:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-20T16:20:00Z</updated>
    <summary>New bilingual source-controlled record: the 25 February 2022 visado is analysed as a possible documentary node between apparent authority, commission, project, Yaiza, tourism, investment, finance, RIC/REF, public support, operation and judicial evidence. The page records COALZ entries 26/008230, 26/008474 and 26/008476 with their limits; the unresolved COAGC professional-data discrepancy; the contextual PwC–Grant Thornton–San Telmo/RICPE–RSM chronology; two Spanish visual indexes with express evidential boundaries; and the status of the 20 August communications. Registration, forwarding or distribution does not mean investigation, breach or merits decision.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RICPE / MYND Yaiza: public question on Decree 224/2022, AEAT and Series F/G</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ricpe-idoneidad-series-f-g/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ricpe-idoneidad-series-f-g/"/>
    <published>2026-08-18T19:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-18T19:15:00Z</updated>
    <summary>New open documentary record: RICPE's audited 2023 accounts separate Series F — Hotel MYND Yaiza, €1,598,849.32 — from Series G — employment creation, €4,974,853.78. The public question is whether Decree 224/2022 and the AEAT binding report of 17 November 2022 covered F, G or both, whether an additional/amended act existed, and what expenditure, liabilities or prior financing justified Series F in the refurbishment/opening chronology. No finding of illegality is made: the page identifies who has competence, which record would answer, and the status of access requests.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RICPE: filing corroborated by Ethical Channel and native platform email</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#ricpe-formal-prefiling-17aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ricpe-documentary-accountability/#formal-communication-17aug"/>
    <published>2026-08-17T23:06:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-17T23:06:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Gil Marer, writing from San Cristóbal de La Laguna, submitted a formal communication through the RICPE Ethical Channel on 17 August 2026. Submission is corroborated by the final platform screen and a native platform email timestamped 17 August 2026, 22:51:17 UTC confirming the communication and assignment of a private follow-up code. The contemporaneous Gmail chain also preserves a digitally signed 22-page PDF, 447,975 bytes, SHA-256 b455075ceda7841471ef5f4ebfbb784ccd00357439aa8bf282e736fe4757832c, whose cryptographic signature validates. That signed PDF differs materially from the earlier 21-page V6 baseline; it is therefore preserved as a later signed object and strong candidate for the filed attachment, while exact byte identity with the channel attachment remains pending platform metadata or certificate evidence. Admission, investigation, conflict screening, preservation measures, Board treatment and merits are not yet established. Access credentials remain private.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RICPE / Sun Park / Orion: governance, finance, ERDF, Portfolio and CNMV</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#ricpe-orion-15aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ricpe-documentary-accountability/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/orion-ricpe-platform-continuity/"/>
    <link rel="related" href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/portfolio-orion-traceability/"/>
    <published>2026-08-15T21:47:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-15T21:47:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The controlled record moves from a linear reading to a documented architecture of governance, knowledge, management and finance. José Acosta Matos sat on the RICPE board before the 2020 Sun Park investor communications; RICPE’s July-2021 record documents fragmented title and conditionality; RICPE founded Orion and the Issue Document describes a 17% RICPE convertible participating-finance channel; AGM is identified as strategic/asset manager and the related-person disclosure reconnects JDAM with FMMM, Shaila Cogolludo, Antonio Cogolludo and Pamalexsha/related interests already present in the Sun Park record. Portfolio confirmed an internal investigation, CNMV said filing 2024136159 would be processed as a consultation, and MYND’s permanent plaque expressly identifies ERDF. The specific asset/value trail from Sun Park/MYND/LPB/Matkator into Orion remains open.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Three-level LAJ supervisory chain activated</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/insolvency-36-2012-laj/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/insolvency-36-2012-laj/"/>
    <published>2026-08-15T19:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-15T19:05:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The same corpus was registered with the Canary Islands High Court Government Secretariat, the Las Palmas Provincial Coordination Secretariat and the national Secretariat-General for preservation, identification and reconstruction of the LAJ documentary chain. Registration does not mean that an investigation has opened.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RICPE correction: Aweswell procedural representation and good-faith third-party exposure</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/updates/#ricpe-scope-correction-14aug</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/ric-private-equity-sun-park/#venia-scope-correction-14aug"/>
    <published>2026-08-14T15:36:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-14T15:36:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The 26 May 2020 record establishes the change in Aweswell’s procedural representation in Concurso 36/2012, not a global termination. Any later effect on residual trust, confidentiality or assistance remains subject to proof.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lender of Record: credit chain and LPB concurso perimeter</title>
    <id>https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/lender-of-record/</id>
    <link href="https://sbu001monterecco.github.io/por-derecho/en/lender-of-record/"/>
    <published>2026-08-14T08:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-14T08:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The page separates the mortgage-credit chain from the disputed financial package and maintains that the limited LPB concurso is not automatic authority over the whole hotel, CEXP, Matkator/third parties, finance or later operation.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
