{
  "schema": "por-derecho.jtp-funded-exit-hostile-reader-red-team.v1",
  "control_id": "PD-JTP-REDTEAM-20260924-01",
  "control_date": "2026-09-24",
  "status": "SIMULATED_ADVERSARIAL_REVIEW_NOT_ACTUAL_PARTY_STATEMENTS",
  "criminal_first_rule": "element-first, not offence-label-first",
  "panel": [
    {
      "reader": "CAM litigation counsel",
      "attack": "No direct CAM→JTP transfer; 2018 and 2020 are separate.",
      "answer": "Concede no direct transfer; test estate source and each bridge.",
      "open": [
        "bank trace",
        "knowledge bridge",
        "causal bridge"
      ]
    },
    {
      "reader": "AC counsel",
      "attack": "Estate payment to debtor counsel can be lawful.",
      "answer": "Concede abstract legality; test specific authority, source, disclosure, independence, condition and effect.",
      "open": [
        "invoice",
        "authority",
        "ledger",
        "communications"
      ]
    },
    {
      "reader": "JTP defence",
      "attack": "Client replaced JTP; protective acts exist; 28 May can be read as acceptance.",
      "answer": "Preserve client substitution and protective acts; exclude 28 May as consent; foreground 12 June final rejection.",
      "open": [
        "full communication chain",
        "act-by-act mandate"
      ]
    },
    {
      "reader": "Sceptical prosecutor",
      "attack": "Where are act, knowledge, purpose, effect and benefit?",
      "answer": "Put proof elements ahead of offence labels and publish falsification/production plan.",
      "open": [
        "actor-specific mens rea",
        "causal effect"
      ]
    },
    {
      "reader": "Forensic accountant",
      "attack": "€400,000→€26,750 trace is incomplete.",
      "answer": "Treat as P0 gap and do not state a completed trace.",
      "open": [
        "purchaser debit",
        "LPB credit",
        "estate ledger",
        "recipient credit"
      ]
    },
    {
      "reader": "Publication counsel",
      "attack": "Leading/associative narrative.",
      "answer": "Attribution, counterevidence, non-transfer rules, falsification and presumption of innocence.",
      "open": [
        "source-specific corrections"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "reading_order": [
    "economic object",
    "7 June pivot",
    "control of value/information",
    "professional/economic leverage",
    "criminal proof elements",
    "civil/mercantile/concursal predicates/remedies"
  ],
  "mandatory_concessions": [
    "no proved direct CAM→JTP transfer",
    "incomplete €400,000→€26,750 bank trace",
    "estate counsel payment can be lawful in principle",
    "client substitution is formal immediate transition act",
    "JTP protective work preserved",
    "chronology is not causation",
    "ONA closing not guaranteed",
    "later lawful outcomes preserved as contrary evidence",
    "28-May reply not consent/waiver/ratification/validation",
    "12-Jun final fee proposal expressly rejected",
    "no adjudicated bribery/collusion/recipient-knowledge/common-plan finding"
  ],
  "a_plus_target_gates": [
    "criminal spine before civil/concursal",
    "hostile defence adjacent",
    "public falsification tests",
    "public P0 production",
    "reciprocal ONA/7June/counsel/payment links",
    "capacity/proceeding non-fusion",
    "exact-head validation",
    "separate merge/deploy/live-readback verification",
    "deep-source audit and dated negative-search result public"
  ],
  "deep_source_sweep": {
    "control_id": "PD-JTP-SOURCE-SWEEP-20260924-01",
    "human_control": "archive/JTP_ONA_DEEP_SOURCE_SWEEP_24SEP2026.md",
    "machine_control": "assets/data/jtp-ona-deep-source-sweep-20260924.json",
    "strengthened": [
      "JTP 4-Jan-2019 draft expressly used criminal/prosecutorial language and requested Ministerio Fiscal referral",
      "May–June 2018 correspondence places JTP inside the ONA/Stoneweg/Cuatrecasas funded-exit/protective context",
      "1-Jun-2020 successor counsel treated JTP as no longer LPB counsel and disputed fee entitlement/double-payment position",
      "12-Jun-2020 final proposal rejection remains direct documentary evidence",
      "AC 21-Jul-2021 report directly records €26,750 Jul-20 counsel payment and separately the €400,000 CAM sale component"
    ],
    "still_open": [
      "JTP invoice",
      "executed payment authority",
      "estate debit",
      "recipient credit",
      "complete estate ledger sufficient to prove source",
      "bank-complete €400,000→€26,750 trace",
      "dated earlier assurance/arrangement proving prospective inducement in January 2019"
    ],
    "negative_search_rule": "Non-retrieval in the bounded connected-source sweep is not proof of non-existence."
  }
}