{
  "schema": "por-derecho.fti-meeting-point-ricpe-causal-evidence.v1",
  "control_id": "PD-FTI-MP-RICPE-CONTINUITY-20260827-01",
  "control_date": "2026-08-27",
  "analysis_order": ["CRIMINAL_FIRST", "INSOLVENCY", "CIVIL_RECOVERY", "CORPORATE_GOVERNANCE", "PUBLIC_CREDIT", "COMPETITION", "WHISTLEBLOWER_PROTECTION"],
  "thesis": {
    "attributed_allegation": "Gil Marer alleges that the Acosta Matos/RICPE local perimeter was instrumental in an asset-level control, project and value transformation that weakened, displaced or obscured Meeting Point's Club Sei opportunity and related rights, records or liabilities, and that the resulting record required disclosure and preservation across later insolvency, restructuring, public-credit and transaction handoffs.",
    "proved_limit": "The local convergence, project/commercial layers and later distress/handoffs are documented. Group-wide business causation, actor-specific crime, deliberate concealment and quantified loss are not proved.",
    "two_meanings_of_unravelling": {
      "evidential": "PROVED_INSTRUMENTAL: CAM/RICPE records are indispensable to reconstructing the local asset, project, finance and commercial chain.",
      "business": "SUPPORTED_HYPOTHESIS_NOT_PROVED: the exact CAM/Meeting Point contract, entity, inventory, termination, bookings, income, stranded costs, P&L and insolvency treatment are required."
    }
  },
  "nodes": [
    {"id":"FMR-N01","period":"2012-2021","label":"Concurso 36/2012 estate and judicial supervision","proved":"Signed acts address access, works, inspection, conservation and liquidation allegations; LPB alone was debtor.","open":"Complete request-to-proof-to-implementation-to-accounting ledger."},
    {"id":"FMR-N02","period":"2018","label":"Material control and exclusion","proved":"The repository documents disputed control/exclusion and later judicial treatment.","open":"Actor-specific instructions, access logs, authority, preservation and economic effect."},
    {"id":"FMR-N03","period":"2018-2020","label":"Lava Verde / Club Sei local commercial convergence","proved":"CAM publicly associated Lava Verde and 279 rooms with C/ Janubio 3; Meeting Point/FTI materials publicly presented Club Sei Lanzarote and a same-address offer.","open":"Exact contract/entity, authority, 279/315 inventory crosswalk, bookings, commissions, revenue and termination."},
    {"id":"FMR-N04","period":"2019-2024","label":"RICPE / HNT / MYND project-finance and benefit layer","proved":"The repository documents RICPE governance/project work and later HNT/MYND finance/incentive layers.","open":"Executed finance, conflicts, source/use, asset-specific benefit, drawdowns, repayments and disclosure."},
    {"id":"FMR-N05","period":"2021-2022","label":"Adjudication and title","proved":"Judicial and transaction records document the later adjudication/title sequence.","open":"Complete bid file, knowledge, information access, valuation, competition and causal effect."},
    {"id":"FMR-N06","period":"2024","label":"FTI compliance 2024-94 and Spanish review route","proved":"FTI logged the reference, held a call, stated review/administrator sharing; Bierbach identified Abegg; Rödl recorded a meeting and document request.","open":"Complete compliance/mandate/workpapers/findings/closure and handoff."},
    {"id":"FMR-N07","period":"2024","label":"Three German insolvencies","proved":"Three distinct Munich proceedings, debtors, opening dates and administrators are documented.","open":"Debtor-specific data-room, schedules, Club Sei treatment, preservation and administrator handoff."},
    {"id":"FMR-N08","period":"2024-2025","label":"Spanish 357/2024, Auren and SEPI/FASEE","proved":"Signed Auto 97/2025 fixes three debtors and 23-Jul/31-Jul/23-Jan/18-Feb milestones; Meeting Point support was EUR 31m, not EUR 56m alone.","open":"Complete file, Sep/Oct originals/allocation, Auren workfile, SEPI source/use, monitoring, disclosure and current exposure."},
    {"id":"FMR-N09","period":"2025-2026","label":"Portobello / BLUESEA control handoff","proved":"CNMC C/1549/25 documents exclusive-control review and MPS management of 15 Canary hotels; buyer-side material records later closing.","open":"Due diligence, liabilities, historic-record disclosure/handover/retention and treatment of Club Sei/Sun Park."},
    {"id":"FMR-N10","period":"2026","label":"RICPE channel closure and CNMV escalation","proved":"Certified receipt/acceptance/assignment, a document request followed by 'No mostrado al denunciante', and inadmission/archive without internal investigation; CNMV transmissions are documented.","open":"Native Ithikios audit trail, Board/conflict/preservation treatment and CNMV receipt/linkage/review of 27-Aug extensions."}
  ],
  "edges": [
    {"id":"FMR-E01","from":"FMR-N01","to":"FMR-N02","support":"DIRECT_PLUS_PROCEDURAL","forward_inference":"Known estate risks and later material control require an act-by-act supervision and implementation test.","reverse_test":"If supervision was effective, the complete file should show timely evidence collection, preservation, enforcement and reconciled estate effect.","counterevidence":"Reasoned orders, suspension, non-convalidation, preserved standing and remedies exist.","production":"Certified complete court file and implementation/accounting matrix."},
    {"id":"FMR-E02","from":"FMR-N02","to":"FMR-N03","support":"CUMULATIVE_PUBLIC_AND_PARTY_RECORD","forward_inference":"Control/access could enable pre-title project work and commercial positioning.","reverse_test":"A lawful independent Meeting Point contract and authority trail could narrow or rebut the alleged control dependence.","counterevidence":"COVID postponement; no proved opening, booking or revenue.","production":"Contract, authority, access, project, PMS/CRS, invoices and bank trail."},
    {"id":"FMR-E03","from":"FMR-N03","to":"FMR-N04","support":"LOCAL_PROJECT_CONTINUITY","forward_inference":"The same local asset/project later entered a RICPE/HNT/MYND finance and benefit layer.","reverse_test":"Executed finance and asset schedules must show whether value was asset-specific, excluded or unrelated.","counterevidence":"Corporate continuity does not prove shared knowledge, funding overlap or unlawful benefit.","production":"Board/conflict file, finance instruments, drawdowns, source/use and asset schedules."},
    {"id":"FMR-E04","from":"FMR-N02","to":"FMR-N05","support":"INVESTIGATIVE_CAUSAL_MODEL","forward_inference":"Control, exclusion and information asymmetry may have conditioned later valuation, competition and adjudication.","reverse_test":"A complete bidding record showing equal information, independent valuation and no effect would falsify the stronger causal claim.","counterevidence":"Competing proposal lacked security/non-appearance; later title followed a formal process.","production":"Complete bid/adjudication file, access logs, valuations, communications and funds-flow."},
    {"id":"FMR-E05","from":"FMR-N03","to":"FMR-N06","support":"DOCUMENTED_NOTICE_CHAIN","forward_inference":"The Club Sei/Sun Park relationship entered FTI's compliance and administrator-appointed Spanish review perimeter.","reverse_test":"The complete 2024-94 file should show exactly what was received, tested, rejected, escalated or handed over.","counterevidence":"A stated review is not proof of conclusion, omission or wrongdoing.","production":"Native 2024-94 file and Rödl/Abegg mandate/workfile."},
    {"id":"FMR-E06","from":"FMR-N06","to":"FMR-N07","support":"STATED_HANDOFF_PLUS_DISTINCT_PROCEEDINGS","forward_inference":"The local issue should be traceable in debtor-specific German custody if the stated handoff occurred.","reverse_test":"Absence from one debtor's file cannot be transferred to another; each data-room and receipt log must be produced.","counterevidence":"Receipt/notice does not prove relevance, claim, asset or liability in each debtor.","production":"Three debtor-specific schedules, data-room logs, legal holds and handoff records."},
    {"id":"FMR-E07","from":"FMR-N03","to":"FMR-N08","support":"ENTITY_AND_DISCLOSURE_QUESTION","forward_inference":"Potential Club Sei rights/liabilities required entity mapping before treatment in 357/2024, Auren and FASEE monitoring could be assessed.","reverse_test":"Complete schedules and workpapers may show disclosure, immateriality, non-contract or correct exclusion.","counterevidence":"The three Spanish debtors are not proved to be the Club Sei contracting entity; no detriment is proved.","production":"Contracting-entity bridge, complete 357 file, Auren workfile and SEPI disclosure/monitoring records."},
    {"id":"FMR-E08","from":"FMR-N07","to":"FMR-N08","support":"CROSS_BORDER_CUSTODY_HYPOTHESIS","forward_inference":"German insolvency custody and Spanish restructuring/public-credit treatment should reconcile group records without merging debtors.","reverse_test":"Independent debtor schedules and handoff indices can confirm or falsify continuity.","counterevidence":"Common branding/group membership does not establish shared assets, knowledge or liability.","production":"Intercompany map, records-transfer logs, debtor schedules and Auren/SEPI receipt indices."},
    {"id":"FMR-E09","from":"FMR-N08","to":"FMR-N09","support":"TRANSACTION_HANDOFF","forward_inference":"Historic rights, contingencies and records material to the Spanish business should be tested in transaction due diligence and retention.","reverse_test":"Data-room disclosure and closing schedules may show complete treatment or irrelevance.","counterevidence":"Acquisition does not transfer predecessor guilt; a reported closing does not prove every disclosure.","production":"Due-diligence index, disclosures, SPA schedules, historic-record handover and retention logs."},
    {"id":"FMR-E10","from":"FMR-N04","to":"FMR-N10","support":"INTERNAL_DOCUMENT_CUSTODY_QUESTION","forward_inference":"RICPE's request for its own 2021 certificate and closure without investigation create an urgent internal-access, conflict and preservation question.","reverse_test":"Native logs and Board records could show lawful independent treatment, accessibility and adequate preservation.","counterevidence":"'No mostrado al denunciante' may be a platform setting/default/error; intent and stakeholder non-receipt are not proved.","production":"Native Ithikios export, access/notification logs, Board minutes, conflict screen, legal hold and document inventory."},
    {"id":"FMR-E11","from":"FMR-N10","to":"FMR-N08","support":"REGULATORY_DISCLOSURE_TEST","forward_inference":"If RICPE records bear materially on public-credit or restructuring disclosures, competent custodians should reconcile them.","reverse_test":"Materiality analyses and disclosure records may show no duty, no nexus or full treatment.","counterevidence":"RICPE internal material is not automatically reportable to SEPI, Auren or every stakeholder.","production":"Actor-specific disclosure duties, materiality assessments, circulation and receipt records."},
    {"id":"FMR-E12","from":"FMR-N10","to":"FMR-N06","support":"ALERT_AND_PRESERVATION_CONTINUITY","forward_inference":"Internal closure increases the need for independent preservation/status verification across previously notified custodians.","reverse_test":"Existing legal holds and complete review files could rebut a suppression/loss hypothesis.","counterevidence":"External publication and CNMV transmission contradict a claim that all authorities were kept unaware.","production":"Cross-custodian legal holds, receipt/assignment logs, review indices and dispositions."}
  ],
  "global_invariants": [
    "Each edge is a testable inference, not automatic proof of the next node.",
    "An allegation against a perimeter never establishes collective or successor liability.",
    "Missing evidence is a production target, not proof of non-existence or concealment.",
    "Criminal responsibility remains actor-, act-, date-, duty-, knowledge-, intent- and effect-specific.",
    "COVID postponement and the wider FTI group liquidity/failed-investor explanations remain visible counterevidence.",
    "No email or filing is authorized by this data set."
  ]
}