{
  "schema": "por-derecho.alberto-meeting-point-multidirectional-evidence.v1",
  "control_id": "PD-ALV-MP357-MULTI-20260827-01",
  "control_date": "2026-08-27",
  "status": "REPOSITORY_CONTROLLED_PUBLIC_SAFE",
  "analysis_order": [
    "CRIMINAL_FIRST",
    "INSOLVENCY",
    "CIVIL_RECOVERY",
    "INSTITUTIONAL_PUBLIC_FUNDS"
  ],
  "scope_separation": {
    "unitary_caret_scope": {
      "control_id": "PD-UNITARY-REDIGEST-20260827-01",
      "confirmed": 21,
      "pending": 3,
      "denominator": 24,
      "changed_by_this_module": true
    },
    "specialist_caret_scope": {
      "control_id": "PD-ALV-MP357-CARET-20260827-01",
      "confirmed": 31,
      "pending": 0,
      "denominator": 31,
      "occurrence_rows": 32,
      "confirmed_occurrence_rows": 32,
      "verdict": "ALL_IS_VERIFIED_FOR_STATED_SCOPE"
    },
    "first_hop_caret_scope": {
      "control_id": "PD-ALV-MP357-FIRST-HOP-CARET-20260827-01",
      "confirmed": 61,
      "pending": 69,
      "denominator": 130,
      "verdict": "FULL_FIRST_HOP_CENSUS_PARTIAL_NOT_ALL_IS",
      "changed_by_this_module": true
    }
  },
  "hub_routes": {
    "es": "/es/alberto-lopez-villarrubia-meeting-point-357-masa-activa/",
    "en": "/en/alberto-lopez-villarrubia-meeting-point-357-active-estate/"
  },
  "public_render_sha256": {
    "algorithm": "sha256(normalized six-field row joined by newline in declared field order)",
    "field_order": [
      "source-supported-fact",
      "supported-investigative-inference",
      "criminal-first-element-gate",
      "strongest-counterevidence",
      "falsification-production-target",
      "reciprocal-links"
    ],
    "es": {
      "AM357-N01": "c36af840e16804bc00c55f66ca5853f9684400e4277eea506802b67cabf5e3a4",
      "AM357-N02": "0657997a9893edadd06fc3dec1407ad95c21ebd575443aeaf5270c03aa6629bf",
      "AM357-N03": "79fec73f66d8d1cbc53c98c1fabaa9b429bc51e92abf9165148a6b0efb4c85e2",
      "AM357-N04": "5d229d17af41180e29e7844d930b684274682925e3cce959fdd38c55cfff7942",
      "AM357-N05": "21438b77b19981f3717762435681037a953fc6af6f9b40aedaa1c1016b7668f5",
      "AM357-N06": "f28a47ca70e5eba8c7713a2684a638135a4830839ebc5ddfdd19637b05f5c00a",
      "AM357-N07": "4b064fa145e0fdf1163cfe5483efae9ed4f4e40780df7dceacf34ef2e825e28a",
      "AM357-N08": "d2e25d69fe4a8d71be4f804325f288ffea5e074aac28b7605872881430bc9994",
      "AM357-N09": "8012fad229eb09b6613ab6b9fb9c8b2749c6ea884e8f49cff0cebd721c08475a"
    },
    "en": {
      "AM357-N01": "64cddcd9625597b5be4fd9f1a7acd19c143688fd5338222013c2b2d0ebdd9d9c",
      "AM357-N02": "a5019aff527865bc36285bedcb8bc92ac5a5d6fb67e90c0b6a560c27f69d8e4a",
      "AM357-N03": "f885d1168f9db732b605ce15dac5721578485dd0bf5c4da7639c305b91a187f8",
      "AM357-N04": "ef265cbb4be86b442bd5e5e8779a23cd6d5b2c38e72b85a80bca842e78ec94aa",
      "AM357-N05": "398c322f24aa0f4f16e03dbeb531f9beab2f123ac1af2dd503afff58a4854ed0",
      "AM357-N06": "47462b2436f838508cfd6cd0fd60ae4ac1923a2269739f9bc76340c2a5b0047f",
      "AM357-N07": "23d61a2e650f3e6de6930243180205f16d82e11da805ba08eabf859b326acbec",
      "AM357-N08": "13def271a3a77a8465051cf9a5a5e0c9a038d98062fd4bcbade169684a42ebf6",
      "AM357-N09": "5c5ed82a80a35e21ece7d2e11e1b5b74ec843e9649e3fd93f4c7eedb4c17fcb2"
    }
  },
  "nodes": [
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N01",
      "period": "2012-2021",
      "title": {"es": "Actor, capacidad y supervisión judicial", "en": "Actor, capacity and judicial supervision"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/concurso-36-2012-magistrado-juez/#ledger", "en": "/en/insolvency-36-2012-mercantile-court-1/#ledger"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2012-06-06-001", "C36-JUD-2018-04-16-001", "C36-JUD-2020-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": ["C36-JUD-2018-06-26-001", "C36-JUD-2019-10-24-001", "C36-JUD-2019-10-24-002"],
        "control_refs": [],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-012", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-058"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": ["https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a446", "https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a447"],
        "source_registers": ["archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_JUDICIAL_LAJ_ACTS_MASTER_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_CANONICAL_COURT_BINARY_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "El magistrado López Villarrubia firmó actos de apertura y decisiones posteriores sobre alegaciones de obras, acceso, inspección, pericial, conservación y liquidación en Concurso 36/2012; LPB era la única concursada.",
        "en": "Magistrate López Villarrubia signed the opening act and later decisions addressing works, access, inspection, expert, conservation and liquidation allegations in Insolvency 36/2012; LPB alone was the debtor."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Fija actor, capacidad, fechas y aviso documentado de alegaciones concretas en actos firmados; permite comprobar si la supervisión dejó un déficit probatorio material.",
        "en": "It fixes actor, capacity, dates and documented notice of specific allegations in signed acts, and permits testing whether supervision left a material evidential deficit."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Una hipótesis de prevaricación u omisión exige resolución o deber exacto, adopción personal, injusticia objetiva o manifiesta, elemento subjetivo histórico aplicable, capacidad y causalidad.",
        "en": "A judicial misconduct or omission theory requires an exact decision or duty, personal adoption, objective or manifest injustice, the historically applicable mental element, capacity and causation."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "La suspensión de 26-jun-2018, la negativa de convalidación de 24-oct-2019, la conservación de la legitimación de Aweswell, la corrección parcial de motivación, los Autos motivados, la función conservativa de la AC y las vías de recurso son la contraprueba judicial más fuerte.",
        "en": "The 26-Jun-2018 suspension, 24-Oct-2019 refusal of convalidation, preservation of Aweswell's standing, partial correction of deficient reasoning, reasoned orders, the administrator's conservation role and remedial routes are the strongest judicial counterrecord."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Expediente certificado completo y matriz acto–petición–prueba disponible–conocimiento–deber–recurso–resultado.",
        "en": "Complete certified file and an act–request–available evidence–knowledge–duty–appeal–result matrix."
      },
      "upstream": [],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N02", "AM357-N07"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N02",
      "period": "2018-2021",
      "title": {"es": "Masa activa, unidad productiva e inspección neutral", "en": "Active estate, productive unit and neutral inspection"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/concurso-36-2012-masa-activa-2018-2021/#contradiccion", "en": "/en/insolvency-36-2012-active-estate-2018-2021/#contradiction"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2018-04-16-001", "C36-JUD-2020-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": ["C36-JUD-2018-06-26-001", "C36-JUD-2019-10-24-001", "C36-JUD-2019-10-24-002"],
        "control_refs": [],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-074", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-075"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": [],
        "source_registers": ["archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_JUDICIAL_LAJ_ACTS_MASTER_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_CANONICAL_COURT_BINARY_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "La arquitectura de liquidación distinguió bienes LPB y ajenos y contempló publicidad/mejora; los Autos de 2020/2021 registran alegaciones de demolición, acceso y obras, rechazan inspección/pericial y remiten conservación a la AC.",
        "en": "The liquidation architecture distinguished LPB assets from third-party assets and contemplated publicity/improvement; the 2020/2021 orders record demolition, access and works allegations, refuse inspection/expert evidence and place conservation with the administrator."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Permite investigar si la falta de línea base finca–foto–daño–valor afectó conservación, valoración, competencia y recuperación de la capa operativa.",
        "en": "It supports investigating whether the missing property–photo–damage–value baseline affected conservation, valuation, competition and recovery of the operating layer."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "La ineficacia o el error no equivalen a delito; una omisión penal necesita deber concreto, conocimiento, capacidad real, equivalencia causal y dolo cuando proceda.",
        "en": "Ineffectiveness or error is not crime; a criminal omission needs a concrete duty, knowledge, practical capacity, causal equivalence and intent where required."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "La suspensión de 26-jun-2018, la negativa de convalidación de 24-oct-2019, la conservación de la legitimación de Aweswell, la corrección parcial de motivación, la titularidad mixta, la competencia conservativa de la AC y las vías de recurso son la contraprueba judicial más fuerte.",
        "en": "The 26-Jun-2018 suspension, 24-Oct-2019 refusal of convalidation, preservation of Aweswell's standing, partial correction of deficient reasoning, mixed ownership, the administrator's conservation role and remedial routes are the strongest judicial counterrecord."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Mapa finca–interior–propietario–obra–daño–valor; solicitudes y respuestas de AC; pericial; cuentas; activos, contratos, ingresos y goodwill de la unidad productiva.",
        "en": "Property–interior–owner–works–damage–value map; administrator requests/responses; expert evidence; accounts; and productive-unit assets, contracts, income and goodwill."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N01"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N03", "AM357-N04"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N03",
      "period": "2018-06",
      "title": {"es": "Control material y exclusión de 7 de junio", "en": "7 June material control and exclusion"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/toma-control-sun-park-7-junio-2018/#hechos-7-junio", "en": "/en/sun-park-takeover-7-june-2018/#events-of-7-june"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["OA-07", "OA-09", "OA-10", "OA-11", "OA-12"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": ["J7-09", "J7-10"],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": ["LZ-JUD-003", "LZ-APP-004"],
        "control_refs": [],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-044", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-045", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-046", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-048", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-050", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-003", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-004", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-005", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-006", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-009", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-010", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-012", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-013", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-014"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": [],
        "source_registers": ["archive/SUN_PARK_PRE_7JUN2018_ONSITE_APPROACHES_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_20AUG2026.md", "archive/SUN_PARK_7JUN2018_RUNUP_SOURCE_INGEST_17AUG2026.md", "archive/SUN_PARK_COMUNIDAD_PROCEEDINGS_REGISTER_CANARY_ISLANDS_15AUG2026.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "El registro preserva una operación material disputada de control/exclusión y una cadena de autoridad incompleta; los carriles de Comunidad, AC y CAM siguen separados.",
        "en": "The record preserves a disputed material control/exclusion operation and an incomplete authority chain; Community, administrator and CAM lanes remain separate."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "La restricción o pérdida de acceso y capacidad operativa alegada y documentada por fuentes de distinto rango puede ser un puente causal hacia obras, asimetría informativa, desactivación del rescate y comercialización posterior.",
        "en": "The restriction or loss of access and operating capacity alleged and recorded by sources of differing rank may be a causal bridge to works, information asymmetry, rescue disablement and later marketing."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Debe identificarse quién ordenó, autorizó, ejecutó, conoció o ratificó cada acto y quién tenía un deber jurídico concreto y capacidad real para impedirlo, con autoridad, dolo, beneficio y perjuicio propios.",
        "en": "The inquiry must identify who ordered, authorised, carried out, knew or ratified each act and who had a concrete legal duty and practical capacity to prevent it, with actor-specific authority, intent, benefit and harm."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "Existen explicaciones de seguridad, conservación y gestión limitada; el archivo penal provisional y el Auto 804/2018 son material procesal adverso. El expediente no prueba una orden directa concreta ni un propósito criminal común.",
        "en": "Security, conservation and limited-management explanations exist; the provisional criminal archive and Order 804/2018 are adverse procedural material. The record does not prove a specific direct instruction or common criminal purpose."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Órdenes, contratos de seguridad, comunicaciones, registros de acceso, llaves, inventarios, autoridad de Comunidad/CEXP/AC y trazado persona–acto–hora.",
        "en": "Instructions, security contracts, communications, access logs, keys, inventories, Community/CEXP/administrator authority and a person–act–time trace."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N02", "AM357-N08"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N04", "AM357-N05"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N04",
      "period": "2021-2022",
      "title": {"es": "Selección, adjudicación, título y contabilidad", "en": "Selection, adjudication, title and accounting"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/adjudicacion-2022-reconstruccion-documental/", "en": "/en/2022-adjudication-documentary-reconstruction/"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": ["C36-JUD-2018-06-26-001", "C36-JUD-2019-10-24-001"],
        "control_refs": [],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-008", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-011", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-012"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": ["https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a250", "https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a446", "https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a447"],
        "source_registers": ["archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_JUDICIAL_LAJ_ACTS_MASTER_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_CANONICAL_COURT_BINARY_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "El tercer postor no compareció, no estaba personado y no depositó fianza; se aprobó la propuesta de CAM. Título, crédito, compensación, valor, pago y contabilidad son funciones distintas.",
        "en": "The third bidder did not attend, was not personated and lodged no bond; CAM's proposal was approved. Title, credit, set-off, value, payment and accounting are distinct functions."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Es un nodo procesal documentado en el camino hacia la adjudicación; permite comprobar si el déficit previo de acceso, información o valoración condicionó la competencia y el resultado.",
        "en": "This is a documented procedural node on the path toward adjudication; it permits testing whether earlier access, information or valuation deficits conditioned competition and result."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Fraude procesal requiere engaño concreto, autor, conocimiento, uso, error judicial, disposición, beneficio y perjuicio; la atribución judicial exige sus elementos separados.",
        "en": "Procedural fraud requires a specific deception, author, knowledge, use, judicial error, disposition, benefit and harm; judicial attribution requires its separate elements."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "Incumplimiento documentado del postor, condiciones competitivas aprobadas y actos protectores/suspensivos previos pueden sostener una explicación procesal lícita.",
        "en": "The bidder's documented default, approved competitive conditions and earlier protective/suspensive acts may support a lawful procedural explanation."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Acta/grabación, oferta y fianza, anexos de activos, crédito–valor–pago–compensación–remanente, escritura, Registro de la Propiedad y asientos contables.",
        "en": "Hearing record, bid and bond, asset annexes, credit–value–payment–set-off–surplus ledger, deed, Land Registry and accounting entries."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N02", "AM357-N03", "AM357-N05"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N09"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N05",
      "period": "2018-2022",
      "title": {"es": "Club Sei: proyecto y comercialización antes del título", "en": "Club Sei: project and marketing before title"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/lava-verde-club-sei-meeting-point/#cadena", "en": "/en/lava-verde-club-sei-meeting-point/#chain"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["LV-01", "LV-02", "LV-03", "LV-04", "LV-05", "LV-08", "LV-09"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": ["LV-06", "LV-07"],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": [],
        "control_refs": ["CR-023"],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-049"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": [],
        "source_registers": ["archive/LAVA_VERDE_CLUB_SEI_MEETING_POINT_PUBLICATION_BASIS_15AUG2026.md", "archive/CORRECTION_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "Fuentes públicas y de proveedores apoyan preparación, piloto y presentación pre-título de Club Sei en la dirección de Sun Park; la persona jurídica, contrato, autoridad, reservas e ingresos exactos no están identificados.",
        "en": "Public and supplier sources support pre-title Club Sei preparation, pilot work and presentation at the Sun Park address; the exact legal person, contract, authority, bookings and revenue are not identified."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Permite probar o refutar si un actor del perímetro Meeting Point/FTI obtuvo autoridad, información, oportunidad comercial, beneficio o custodia vinculados al activo antes del título.",
        "en": "It permits proving or disproving whether a Meeting Point/FTI-perimeter actor obtained authority, information, commercial opportunity, benefit or custody linked to the asset before title."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Cualquier explotación no autorizada, fraude o lesión concursal exige persona jurídica exacta, acto, autoridad, conocimiento, dolo, ingreso/beneficio y pérdida de masa o tercero.",
        "en": "Any unauthorised exploitation, fraud or estate-injury theory requires the exact legal person, act, authority, knowledge, intent, revenue/benefit and estate or third-party loss."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "Aplazamiento COVID; marketing y pilotos no prueban apertura, reservas, ingresos, autoridad de todo el hotel, contrato ni delito.",
        "en": "COVID postponement; marketing and pilots do not prove opening, bookings, revenue, whole-hotel authority, contract or crime."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Persona jurídica/NIF, contratos, inventario de habitaciones/fincas, autoridad, PMS/OTA, reservas, facturas, comisiones, pagos y comunicaciones con CAM/AC.",
        "en": "Legal person/NIF, contracts, room/property inventory, authority, PMS/OTA, bookings, invoices, commissions, payments and CAM/administrator communications."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N03"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N04", "AM357-N06", "AM357-N07"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N06",
      "period": "2022-present",
      "title": {"es": "SEPI/FASEE: crédito público, revelación y pérdida", "en": "SEPI/FASEE: public credit, disclosure and loss"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/fti-touristik-meeting-point-insolvencia-preconcurso-bluesea/#sepi", "en": "/en/fti-touristik-meeting-point-insolvency-preinsolvency-bluesea/#sepi"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": [],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": [],
        "control_refs": ["CR-101"],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-049"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": ["https://www.sepi.es/es/sala-de-prensa/noticias/el-consejo-de-ministros-autoriza-nuevas-ayudas-con-cargo-al-fondo-de-apoyo", "https://www.sepi.es/sites/default/files/2024-08/FASEE_Cuentas%20anuales_2023.pdf"],
        "source_registers": ["archive/FTI_MEETING_POINT_INSOLVENCY_PREINSOLVENCY_BLUESEA_PUBLICATION_BASIS_21AUG2026.md", "archive/CORRECTION_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "SEPI documenta EUR 31m para Meeting Point: EUR 20,7m participativo y EUR 10,3m ordinario; las cuentas FASEE aportan asignaciones por entidad.",
        "en": "SEPI documents EUR 31m for Meeting Point: EUR 20.7m participating and EUR 10.3m ordinary; FASEE accounts provide entity allocations."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Si existían derechos, riesgos o contingencias materiales Sun Park/Club Sei, nace una prueba de revelación, seguimiento, custodia y posible impacto de crédito público.",
        "en": "If material Sun Park/Club Sei rights, risks or contingencies existed, a disclosure, monitoring, custody and possible public-credit impact test arises."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Falsedad, omisión o uso indebido requieren declarante/obligado, deber, materialidad, conocimiento, confianza, aplicación de fondos y pérdida cuantificada; no es automáticamente fraude de subvenciones.",
        "en": "Falsehood, omission or misuse require a declarant/obligor, duty, materiality, knowledge, reliance, use of funds and quantified loss; this is not automatically subsidy fraud."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "No hay trazado actual a Sun Park, omisión probada, deterioro, perjuicio ni deber personal judicial de aviso a SEPI.",
        "en": "There is no current tracing into Sun Park, proved omission, impairment, harm or personal judicial duty to notify SEPI."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Instrumentos, garantías, origen/uso, disclosures, seguimiento, repagos, intereses, exposición y deterioro; expedientes del deudor, SEPI y Auren.",
        "en": "Instruments, security, source/use, disclosures, monitoring, repayments, interest, exposure and impairment; debtor, SEPI and Auren files."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N05"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N07"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N07",
      "period": "2024-2025",
      "title": {"es": "Meeting Point 357/2024: atribución, reparto y archivo Auren", "en": "Meeting Point 357/2024: attribution, allocation and Auren file"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/cuaderno-juridico/meeting-point-357-2024-trazabilidad-judicial/#registro", "en": "/en/legal-notebook/meeting-point-357-2024-judicial-traceability/#register"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["GC-CONT-025", "LV-12"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": [],
        "control_refs": ["CR-100", "CR-108", "CR-109"],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-049"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": ["https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a446", "https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444#a447", "https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1985-12666#a219"],
        "source_registers": ["archive/SUN_PARK_COMUNIDAD_PROCEEDINGS_REGISTER_CANARY_ISLANDS_15AUG2026.md", "archive/FTI_MEETING_POINT_INSOLVENCY_PREINSOLVENCY_BLUESEA_PUBLICATION_BASIS_21AUG2026.md", "archive/LAVA_VERDE_CLUB_SEI_MEETING_POINT_PUBLICATION_BASIS_15AUG2026.md", "archive/CORRECTION_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "Los controles de fuente del repositorio registran tres copias archivadas de anuncios de 24-oct que atribuyen la prórroga al Magistrado-Juez López Villarrubia; Auto 97/2025 firmado por Guillermo Fernández García acredita tres deudores, cronología 23/31-jul, petición Auren 23-ene y nombramiento 18-feb.",
        "en": "Repository source controls record three archived copies of 24-Oct notices attributing the extension to Magistrate-Judge López Villarrubia; Auto 97/2025 signed by Guillermo Fernández García establishes three debtors, the 23/31-Jul chronology, 23-Jan Auren request and 18-Feb appointment."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Activa producción seria sobre firma, reparto, conocimiento, posible causa del art. 219 y contenido/custodia de 357/Auren; no cierra ninguna de esas proposiciones.",
        "en": "It triggers serious production on signature, allocation, knowledge, any Article 219 ground and 357/Auren content/custody; it closes none of those propositions."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "CP 446 exige adopción personal, injusticia objetiva/manifiesta, conocimiento o dolo y causalidad; CP 447 exige, según la norma temporal aplicable, imprudencia grave o ignorancia inexcusable. El art. 219 es una prueba procesal separada, no delito por sí mismo. Una teoría de ocultación exige delito y deber exactos, actor, dato conocido, omisión material, elemento subjetivo y efecto.",
        "en": "CP 446 requires personal adoption, objective/manifest injustice, knowledge or intent and causation; CP 447 requires, under the applicable historical text, gross negligence or inexcusable ignorance. Article 219 is a separate procedural test, not itself an offence. A concealment theory requires an exact offence and duty, actor, known fact, material omission, mental element and effect."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "Sustitución ordinaria, refuerzo, reasignación, corrección o error registral podrían explicar los nombres; no se ha probado una causa legal de abstención.",
        "en": "Ordinary substitution, support, reassignment, correction or registry error could explain the names; no statutory recusal ground is proved."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Originales 18-sep/24-oct, metadatos, reparto/sustitución/refuerzo/corrección, abstención/recusación/revelación, comunicación completa y anexos, mandato, conflicto, solicitudes, recibos, informes y papeles Auren.",
        "en": "18-Sep/24-Oct originals, metadata, allocation/substitution/support/correction, abstention/recusal/disclosure, complete communication and annexes, and Auren mandate, conflict check, requests, receipts, reports and workpapers."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N01", "AM357-N05", "AM357-N06"],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N09"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N08",
      "period": "2018-2019",
      "title": {"es": "Salida financiada ONA y contrafactual competitivo", "en": "ONA funded exit and competitive counterfactual"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/ona-hotels-salida-concurso-36-2012/expediente-unitario-abril-2018-octubre-2019/", "en": "/en/ona-hotels-insolvency-exit-36-2012/unitary-record-april-2018-october-2019/"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["ONA-FX-001", "ONA-FX-002", "ONA-FX-003", "ONA-FX-005", "ONA-FX-006", "ONA-FX-007", "ONA-FX-008", "ONA-FX-009"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": ["ONA-FX-004"],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": [],
        "control_refs": ["PD-ONA-FX-20260826-01"],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-084", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md#ME-CAM7J-007"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": [],
        "source_registers": ["archive/evidence/ONA_FUNDED_EXIT_UNITARY_FACT_RECORD_20260826.md", "archive/ONA_COMMERCIAL_EXIT_OPERATIONAL_NORMALISATION_PACKAGE_2018_16AUG2026.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER_CAM_7JUNE_CRIMINAL_LEAD_ADDENDUM_23AUG2026.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "El expediente documenta una arquitectura propuesta de salida financiada ONA–Clubotel–Aweswell/LPB, con actores profesionales y sujeta a condiciones, garantías, aprobación y desembolso aún incompletos.",
        "en": "The record documents a proposed ONA–Clubotel–Aweswell/LPB funded-exit architecture with professional actors, subject to still-incomplete conditions, security, approval and drawdown."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Proporciona un contrafactual para medir si control/exclusión, pérdida operativa y decisiones posteriores impidieron una arquitectura financiada que habría debido superar sus condiciones, y si afectaron valor o competencia.",
        "en": "It provides a counterfactual for measuring whether control/exclusion, operating loss and later decisions prevented a proposed financed architecture that still had to satisfy its conditions, and whether value or competition was affected."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "El fracaso de una negociación no prueba interferencia criminal; exige condiciones cumplibles, autoridad, conocimiento, acto causal, finalidad, beneficio y pérdida cuantificada.",
        "en": "Failure of a negotiation does not prove criminal interference; it requires feasible conditions, authority, knowledge, a causal act, purpose, benefit and quantified loss."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "Faltan cierre, garantía y condiciones completas; la operación podía fracasar por razones comerciales o jurídicas independientes.",
        "en": "Closing, security and complete conditions are missing; the transaction could have failed for independent commercial or legal reasons."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Term sheet, financiación, garantías, autorizaciones, condiciones precedentes, cronología de cierre/ruptura y comunicaciones con AC, tribunal, acreedores y postores.",
        "en": "Term sheet, financing, security, authority, conditions precedent, closing/break chronology and communications with administrator, court, creditors and bidders."
      },
      "upstream": [],
      "downstream": ["AM357-N03"]
    },
    {
      "node_id": "AM357-N09",
      "period": "2012-present",
      "title": {"es": "Resultado observable, beneficio, perjuicio y respuesta institucional", "en": "Observable result, benefit, harm and institutional response"},
      "primary_routes": {"es": "/es/reconstruccion-unitaria-autoridades-publicas/", "en": "/en/public-authority-unitary-case-reconstruction/"},
      "evidence": {
        "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001", "SP-PRV-LCTR-GM-DB9D2197E93B05C8AF7B", "LV-12"],
        "attributed_statement_refs": [],
        "adverse_procedural_refs": [],
        "control_refs": ["CR-101"],
        "missing_evidence_refs": ["archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-008", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-011", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-012", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-049", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md#ME-058"],
        "integrity_refs": [],
        "external_sources": ["https://www.sepi.es/es/sala-de-prensa/noticias/el-consejo-de-ministros-autoriza-nuevas-ayudas-con-cargo-al-fondo-de-apoyo", "https://www.sepi.es/sites/default/files/2024-08/FASEE_Cuentas%20anuales_2023.pdf"],
        "source_registers": ["archive/CONCURSO_36_2012_JUDICIAL_LAJ_ACTS_MASTER_REGISTER_17AUG2026.md", "archive/CAM_2022_ADJUDICATION_TRANSACTION_IDENTITY_AND_CONSIDERATION_CONTROL_19AUG2026.md", "archive/LAVA_VERDE_CLUB_SEI_MEETING_POINT_PUBLICATION_BASIS_15AUG2026.md", "archive/FTI_MEETING_POINT_INSOLVENCY_PREINSOLVENCY_BLUESEA_PUBLICATION_BASIS_21AUG2026.md", "archive/CORRECTION_REGISTER.md", "archive/MISSING_EVIDENCE_REGISTER.md"]
      },
      "source_supported_fact": {
        "es": "La transacción notarial de 2022 y los registros oficiales de apoyo público y estados procesales son observables en carriles jurídicos separados. No están acreditados aquí el título beneficiario actual exacto, el operador jurídico actual, la cuantía o destinatario de ingresos ni las distribuciones.",
        "en": "The 2022 notarial transaction and official public-support and procedural-state records are observable in separate legal lanes. This module does not establish exact current beneficial title, the current legal operator, income amount or recipient, or distributions."
      },
      "supported_investigative_inference": {
        "es": "Permite reconstruir hacia atrás quién se benefició, qué activo/derecho cambió, qué registro debía existir y qué causalidad o pérdida puede medirse; no convierte el resultado en prueba retroactiva de delito.",
        "en": "It permits backward reconstruction of who benefited, what asset/right changed, what record should exist and what causation or loss can be measured; it does not turn the result into retrospective proof of crime."
      },
      "criminal_first_element_gate": {
        "es": "Debe probarse delito por delito y actor por actor: acto/omisión, deber/autoridad, conocimiento/dolo, nexo, beneficio, perjudicado, cuantía y ausencia de doble recuperación.",
        "en": "Proof must remain offence-by-offence and actor-by-actor: act/omission, duty/authority, knowledge/intent, nexus, benefit, injured party, quantum and no double recovery."
      },
      "strongest_counterevidence": {
        "es": "La adjudicación pudo ser lícita; el incumplimiento documentado del postor, las decisiones motivadas y la falta de puentes documentales siguen siendo explicaciones y límites reales.",
        "en": "The adjudication may have been lawful; the bidder's documented default, reasoned decisions and missing documentary bridges remain real explanations and limits."
      },
      "falsification_production_target": {
        "es": "Cadena de título/beneficiario, capex, ingresos, financiación, distribuciones, reclamante–finca–pérdida–remedio, decisiones institucionales completas y contrafactual de valor.",
        "en": "Title/beneficial-owner chain, capex, income, financing, distributions, claimant–property–loss–remedy ledger, complete institutional decisions and value counterfactual."
      },
      "upstream": ["AM357-N04", "AM357-N07"],
      "downstream": []
    }
  ],
  "edges": [
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E01",
      "from": "AM357-N01",
      "to": "AM357-N02",
      "evidence_lane": "judicial-supervision-to-estate-preservation",
      "support_level": "DOCUMENTED_PROCEDURAL_NODES_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2018-04-16-001", "C36-JUD-2020-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001"],
      "forward_inference": "Did documented notice of the stated allegations and the chosen evidential measures affect preservation and valuation?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Would the complete estate and inspection record show effective protection or no causal effect?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The suspension, refusal of convalidation, reasoned later orders, administrator conservation role and available remedies support a lawful-supervision explanation.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the certified docket and a dated act-request-evidence-knowledge-duty-remedy-result matrix, including every inspection and conservation request and response."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E02",
      "from": "AM357-N02",
      "to": "AM357-N03",
      "evidence_lane": "estate-perimeter-to-material-control",
      "support_level": "MIXED_PROCEDURAL_AND_ATTRIBUTED_RECORD_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001", "OA-07", "OA-09", "LZ-JUD-003"],
      "forward_inference": "Did unresolved ownership, access and conservation conditions enable the disputed control change?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do authority, access and inventory records establish a limited lawful operation with no estate displacement?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "Mixed ownership, the administrator's conservation competence, security explanations and the adverse provisional criminal archive may explain the control measures without estate displacement.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the property-by-property ownership and inventory baseline, administrator authority, security mandate, access logs, keys record and person-act-time chronology."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E03",
      "from": "AM357-N08",
      "to": "AM357-N03",
      "evidence_lane": "funded-exit-to-control",
      "support_level": "CONDITIONAL_COUNTERFACTUAL_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["ONA-FX-001", "ONA-FX-003", "ONA-FX-006", "OA-09"],
      "forward_inference": "Did control/exclusion interrupt the proposed funded-exit route, and could that route have satisfied its outstanding conditions?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do finance and condition-precedent records show the proposed route independently could not have completed?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "No closing, security perfection, satisfied conditions precedent or drawdown is established; independent commercial or legal failure remains a complete alternative explanation.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the term sheet, committed-funds proof, security package, conditions-precedent ledger, authority approvals and event-level closing or break chronology."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E04",
      "from": "AM357-N02",
      "to": "AM357-N04",
      "evidence_lane": "valuation-to-adjudication",
      "support_level": "DOCUMENTED_PROCEDURAL_NODES_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2020-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001"],
      "forward_inference": "Did any neutral-evidence deficit materially condition bidding or valuation?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Would the complete bid and valuation file show equal information and no outcome effect?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The approved competitive conditions, the third bidder's non-appearance and missing bond, and the absence of a bidder inspection request may explain the result without a valuation distortion.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the complete valuation and bidder data rooms, access parity record, inspection requests, asset schedules, all bids and bonds, hearing record and valuation-to-result comparison."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E05",
      "from": "AM357-N03",
      "to": "AM357-N05",
      "evidence_lane": "control-to-commercialisation",
      "support_level": "MIXED_PUBLIC_AND_ATTRIBUTED_RECORD_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["OA-09", "OA-10", "LV-01", "LV-03", "LV-08"],
      "forward_inference": "Did material control supply access, information or opportunity for Club Sei?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do contracts, access records and supplier files show independent lawful authority and no use of disputed assets?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "Security or limited-management explanations, COVID postponement, and the absence of proved bookings, revenue or a whole-site operating contract may sever the alleged bridge.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce dated access and key records, the exact Club Sei legal entity and NIF, supplier instructions, property and room schedules, authority contracts, PMS or OTA records, invoices and payments."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E06",
      "from": "AM357-N05",
      "to": "AM357-N04",
      "evidence_lane": "pre-title-commercialisation-to-adjudication",
      "support_level": "MIXED_PUBLIC_AND_PROCEDURAL_RECORD_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["LV-01", "LV-02", "LV-08", "C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001"],
      "forward_inference": "Did any proved pre-title Club Sei access, information, commercial positioning or benefit materially condition competition or adjudication?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do dated contracts, property schedules, title and bid records eliminate the alleged pre-title causal bridge or show no outcome effect?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "Public presentation and pilot work do not establish operation, bookings, revenue, bidder advantage or influence on the adjudication; documented bidder default offers an independent explanation.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the dated Club Sei contract-authority-revenue file alongside the title, property schedule, bidder information sets, bids, bonds and decision record to test temporal and outcome causation."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E07",
      "from": "AM357-N05",
      "to": "AM357-N06",
      "evidence_lane": "commercial-rights-to-public-credit",
      "support_level": "PUBLIC_AND_OFFICIAL_CONTEXT_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["LV-08", "LV-09", "CR-101", "https://www.sepi.es/sites/default/files/2024-08/FASEE_Cuentas%20anuales_2023.pdf"],
      "forward_inference": "Were material Club Sei/Sun Park rights, risks or contingencies relevant to FASEE disclosure or monitoring?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do loan and disclosure files show no relevant item, no duty or full disclosure?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The current record neither identifies a debtor-owned Club Sei right nor proves a disclosure duty, omission, reliance, impairment or public loss.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce entity-specific FASEE applications, representations, security and monitoring files together with Sun Park or Club Sei contracts, rights, risks, contingencies and source-and-use records."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E08",
      "from": "AM357-N05",
      "to": "AM357-N07",
      "evidence_lane": "club-sei-to-three-debtor-file",
      "support_level": "PUBLIC_AND_ARCHIVED_CONTEXT_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["LV-08", "LV-09", "LV-12", "GC-CONT-025", "CR-100"],
      "forward_inference": "Did any exact 357 debtor hold a Club Sei/Sun Park contract, asset, claim, contingency or record?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do complete debtor schedules and Auren workpapers show no such connection or responsibility?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The exact contracting entity remains unidentified, and neither public marketing nor the three-debtor proceeding proves that any debtor owned a Club Sei or Sun Park asset, claim or liability.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce each debtor's complete asset, contract, claim and contingency schedules, intercompany records, Club Sei entity documents and the corresponding Auren intake and verification workpapers."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E09",
      "from": "AM357-N01",
      "to": "AM357-N07",
      "evidence_lane": "cross-proceeding-judicial-attribution",
      "support_level": "SIGNED_ACTS_AND_REGISTER_ATTRIBUTION_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2012-06-06-001", "C36-JUD-2021-02-24-001", "LV-12", "GC-CONT-025", "CR-108"],
      "forward_inference": "Was the 24-Oct attribution a signed act, substitution, support, reassignment, correction or registry error, and what knowledge was material?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do the original and allocation records establish ordinary assignment, no Article 219 ground and no relevant cross-file knowledge?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "Ordinary substitution, support, reassignment, correction or registry error remain open, and the controlled record proves neither a signed 24 October act nor an Article 219 conflict ground.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the signed 18 September and 24 October originals, Public Insolvency Register metadata and custody, reparto and substitution records, and any abstention, recusal or disclosure file."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E10",
      "from": "AM357-N06",
      "to": "AM357-N07",
      "evidence_lane": "public-credit-to-restructuring",
      "support_level": "OFFICIAL_PUBLIC_CREDIT_AND_SIGNED_PROCEDURAL_CONTEXT_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["CR-101", "https://www.sepi.es/es/sala-de-prensa/noticias/el-consejo-de-ministros-autoriza-nuevas-ayudas-con-cargo-al-fondo-de-apoyo", "GC-CONT-025", "CR-100"],
      "forward_inference": "How were FASEE claims, conditions, security and disclosures treated in 357/2024?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do the complete communication and SEPI file show accurate treatment and no creditor/public loss?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The official EUR 31 million support record and the later three-debtor proceeding do not by themselves establish inaccurate treatment, omitted security, reliance, impairment or loss.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the complete 357/2024 communication and annexes, creditor and security schedules, Auren workfile, SEPI monitoring and repayment files, and final restructuring treatment by exact debtor."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E11",
      "from": "AM357-N07",
      "to": "AM357-N09",
      "evidence_lane": "restructuring-to-institutional-consequence",
      "support_level": "PROCEDURAL_CONTEXT_TO_OUTCOME_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["GC-CONT-025", "LV-12", "CR-100", "CR-101", "SP-PRV-LCTR-GM-DB9D2197E93B05C8AF7B"],
      "forward_inference": "Did any proven omission or conflict affect creditor or public-funds outcomes?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do final restructuring, monitoring and outcome records show no material omission, reliance or loss?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "No omission, statutory conflict, institutional reliance, altered restructuring result, creditor shortfall or public-funds loss is presently established.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce final restructuring decisions and creditor outcomes, SEPI exposure and recovery records, any conflict decision, counterfactual treatment and claimant-specific quantum analysis."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E12",
      "from": "AM357-N04",
      "to": "AM357-N09",
      "evidence_lane": "title-to-benefit-loss",
      "support_level": "DOCUMENTED_TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_TO_OUTCOME_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001", "SP-PRV-LCTR-GM-DB9D2197E93B05C8AF7B"],
      "forward_inference": "What benefit, estate loss and claimant-specific damage followed from adjudication and later operation?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Does the title, payment, capex, income and distribution ledger support lawful value and no recoverable loss?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "The adjudication may have been lawful, the bidder default is documented, and the current record does not establish current beneficial ownership, income recipients, distributions or recoverable loss.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the deed and registration chain, credit-value-payment-set-off-surplus accounting, beneficial ownership, capex, operator, income and distribution ledgers, and claimant-by-claimant loss analysis."
    },
    {
      "edge_id": "AM357-E13",
      "from": "AM357-N03",
      "to": "AM357-N04",
      "evidence_lane": "material-control-to-adjudication",
      "support_level": "MIXED_CONTROL_AND_PROCEDURAL_RECORD_BRIDGE_UNPROVED",
      "source_refs": ["OA-09", "OA-10", "LZ-JUD-003", "C36-JUD-2021-05-12-001", "C36-JUD-2021-05-18-001"],
      "forward_inference": "Did any proved control or exclusion materially condition access, information, valuation, rescue capacity, bidding or adjudication?",
      "reverse_falsification": "Do complete access, valuation, rescue and bid records show equal conditions, no displacement and no outcome effect?",
      "strongest_contrary_evidence": "Security and conservation explanations, adverse procedural material, approved competitive conditions and the third bidder's default may independently account for the events and result.",
      "confirm_or_falsify_production": "Produce the complete access, authority, rescue, valuation and bidder-information chronology, all bids and bonds, hearing record and a counterfactual test of outcome with and without the alleged exclusion."
    }
  ],
  "boundaries": [
    "The matrix is an investigative inference graph, not a judicial or criminal finding.",
    "Every forward inference is paired with a reverse falsification route and the strongest lawful or innocent explanation.",
    "Economic unity does not merge legal persons, titles, debts, estates, acts, knowledge, intent or liability.",
    "A later benefit or current operation does not retroactively prove an earlier offence.",
    "No current evidence establishes knowing judicial injustice, an improper relationship, a statutory Article 219 ground or a personal judicial duty to notify SEPI.",
    "For AM357-N07, public Git preserves aggregate source controls but not the signed Auto 97/2025 binary or a reproducible per-copy full-hash custody manifest for the three notices; do not claim public-binary integrity closure.",
    "The ONA relationship to the 7 June event is carried as a separate attributed/counterfactual lane in AM357-N08 and edge AM357-E03, not as an affirmative AM357-N03 fact.",
    "Daily Decanato reference no. 24 is a presentation locator, not a formal NIG or proceeding."
  ]
}