{ "schema": "por-derecho.ac-counsel-interference-unitary.v1", "control_id": "PD-AC-COUNSEL-20260921-01", "control_date": "2026-09-21", "status": "SOURCE_CONTROLLED_PROSECUTORIAL_REDIGEST", "canonical_public_routes": { "es": "/es/continuidad-defensa-letrados/", "en": "/en/counsel-defence-continuity/", "actors_es": "/es/actores-partes-abogados-representantes/", "actors_en": "/en/actors-parties-lawyers-representatives/" }, "attribution_lock": { "client_thesis": "Gil Marer alleges that repeated Insolvency Administrator acts progressively poisoned defence continuity and independence.", "not_adjudicated": [ "criminality", "bribery", "corruption", "criminal proceeds", "collusion", "recipient knowledge", "universal causation" ] }, "corpus_control": { "parrilla_mastery_audit_date": "2026-08-24", "parrilla_direct_messages_unique": 1094, "parrilla_direct_messages_body_readable": 1092, "drive_documents_unique": 429, "connected_text_mastery_percent": 98.6, "current_reverification": "Critical 2018/2020/2023/2026 transition and pressure communications re-read on 2026-09-21; public GitLab Pages comparator reconciled." }, "actors": [ { "id": "A8", "name": "Cristo Ayose Suárez Pimentel", "mechanism": "DIRECT_DEFINED_MANDATE_TERMINATION_BAR_THREAT", "documented": [ "12-Dec-2017 DP 1041/2017 application for assignment deed/price/payment/cost information", "25-Jan-2018 IA email: Bar notice threat, termination, venia request, abstention demand, judicial-action warning and procurator filing gate", "4-Feb-2023 Cristo forward characterising the email as concerning the Bar complaint and other threats" ], "client_position": "VALUED_FORMER_COUNSEL_POTENTIALLY_AFFECTED_RESTORATIVE", "open": [ "Whether ICATF received an actual complaint or opened a file", "DP 1041 withdrawal instruction/authorship/causation" ] }, { "id": "A1", "name": "Juan Tomás Parrilla Suárez", "mechanism": "FEE_PAYMENT_INTERMEDIATION_DURING_CLIENT_INITIATED_TRANSITION", "documented": [ "28-Nov-2018 €400,000 operational-finca sale to CAM", "20-Dec-2018 IA report: cheque effective, LPB Santander account, IA self-payment", "24-Oct-2019 refusal of convalidation", "28-May-2020 Parrilla fee negotiation contemplating €25,000 immediate IA payment and further estate claim", "28-May-2020 outgoing-counsel intermediation of IA contact request", "31-May-2020 client replacement framed as mutual loss of confidence", "1-Jun-2020 incoming-counsel report: peace, possible complaint withdrawal, payment assurance for Parrilla/procurator, praise of Parrilla", "11-Jun-2020 controlled fee account: €32,250 received; rejected €50,000 proposal; stated €17,750 + IGIC balance", "later IA report: €25,000 + 7% IGIC (€26,750) paid" ], "client_criminal_allegation": "Gil characterises the combination as an illicit inducement / effectively an open bribe and alleges sale-proceeds funding.", "boundaries": [ "No adjudicated bribery or corruption finding", "No independently complete €400,000-sale to €26,750 bank trace", "Receipt does not prove Parrilla knowledge of criminal origin", "Client initiated substitution after loss of confidence" ], "p0": [ "invoice", "payment authority", "IGIC/cost allocation", "complete estate ledger", "matching bank debit" ] }, { "id": "A3", "name": "Joaquín Ruiz de Infante Abella", "mechanism": "PERSONAL_CRIMINAL_EXPOSURE_AROUND_DEFENCE_PLEADING", "documented": [ "5-Feb-2020 IA Article 215.2 licence request", "19-Feb-2020 providencia granting procedural gate for potential complaint against Gil, procurator and Joaquín", "27-Feb-2020 Cristo contemporaneous opinion that the route appeared intended to frighten lawyers from continuing to denounce", "21-Sep-2020 irrevocable withdrawal citing irreparable lawyer-client breakdown", "withdrawal filing also contained apologies to IA and withdrawal of subjective dishonesty characterisation" ], "boundaries": [ "Article 215.2 order was not a merits finding", "Complaint filing/admission/success not established by the order alone", "Withdrawal had independent lawyer-client-breakdown evidence", "No exclusive AC causation finding" ] }, { "id": "A4", "name": "Daniel Jiménez García / SLJ", "mechanism": "INCOMING_COUNSEL_ACCESS_AND_PEACE_CHANNEL", "documented": [ "22-May-2020 engagement accepted", "28-May-2020 written warning against off-record IA intermediation", "1-Jun-2020 IA call report", "5-Jun-2020 reported CAM-lawyer request through IA to arrange contact", "23-Jun-2020 resignation citing strategy/client direction/non-payment" ], "boundaries": [ "No proof proposed CAM call occurred", "No proof IA contact caused resignation", "Jiménez challenged IA positions and disclosed the contacts" ] } ], "differentiated_controls": [ { "name": "Cuatrecasas", "finding": "Material IA workstream impact; favourable work and unpaid-fee withdrawal reason preserved; no single-cause exit finding." }, { "name": "Luis Miguel López Gómez", "finding": "Administrator-controlled payment dependency auditable; withdrawal reasons include time/fees/non-payment; no specific causative refusal proved." }, { "name": "Garrigues", "finding": "Early role predates examined IA conduct; no AC-caused departure established." } ], "gitlab_comparator": { "scanned": "2026-09-21", "status": "PUBLIC_PAGES_COMPARATOR_ONLY", "result": "Material A1-A4 propositions already present in GitHub; one-by-one framing reconciled into current GitHub controls rather than copied blindly." }, "publication_lock": [ "Do not state Parrilla was bribed as established fact.", "Do not state €26,750 is bank-proved to derive from the €400,000 sale.", "Do not state Parrilla knew of criminal origin.", "Do not state the Article 215.2 route was unlawful as established fact.", "Do not state the IA caused every counsel withdrawal.", "Keep Joaquín's apology and lawyer-client breakdown as contrary evidence.", "Keep Cristo restorative/non-adverse classification." ], "anti_fragmentation_domino_rule": { "status": "CONTROLLING_24SEP2026", "documented": [ "29–30-May-2018 ONA/Stoneweg/Cuatrecasas correspondence advancing transaction, DD/term-sheet and concurso-facing document", "7-Jun-2018 contemporaneous asserted-possession emails plus immediate complaint/evidence-preservation response", "12-Jun-2020 Daniel/Patricia correspondence expressly rejecting Parrilla's final fee proposal and moving toward insolvency incident" ], "attributed_unitary_position": "Gil Marer treats the 2020 rejection as a downstream act of resistance within one alleged chain from funded exit through 7-Jun disruption, defence/professional conflict, payment/intermediation and downstream loss/recovery consequences.", "rules": [ "Do not treat the 28-May client-side reply as consent or validation.", "Do not isolate the fee episode as a standalone billing dispute when analysing the wider causal chronology.", "Do not claim the 12-Jun rejection itself proves sabotage, common intent, criminality or each upstream causal link.", "Every domino/arrow requires its own source bridge, contrary evidence and actor-specific attribution." ] } }