# LAJ TESTIMONIO LEDGER — Concurso 36/2012

Evidence cut-off: 15 Aug 2026. Purpose: reconstruct request → decision → testimony → notification → delivery → external use without imputing motive.

## Identified LAJs
- Eduardo José Rebollo Sanz — authentic copy/signature associated with the 26 Jun 2018 order.
- Águeda Reyes Almeida — documented office acts including 2018 testimony handling and 2021/2022 CAM testimony orders.
- María Teresa Oliver Guerra — documented 11 Mar 2019 office act. Any further attribution requires primary copy/index confirmation.

## Ledger
| Date | Requester | Registry / trigger | LAJ | Documented office act | Notification evidence located | External use/destination | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2018 | Administrador Concursal | escrito 6611/18 | Águeda Reyes Almeida | "Hágasele entrega de los testimonios interesados"; same DIOR separately ordered testimony of the 26/06/2018 order to Juzgado de Instrucción nº2 Arrecife | full service matrix not yet reconstructed | Arrecife destination documented for 26/06 order; AC testimony destination/use requires reconstruction | PARTIAL |
| 25 Oct 2021 | Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A. | escrito 7336/2021 via Gerardo Pérez Almeida | Águeda Reyes Almeida | issue/deliver testimony of orders 18/05/2021 and 15/10/2021 | copy contains later notation of notification to counsel; complete party-by-party service log still required | downstream notary/registry use not yet proved from this document alone | VERIFIED/PARTIAL |
| 14 Feb 2022 | Construcciones Acosta Matos, S.A. | escrito 820/2022 via Gerardo Pérez Almeida | Águeda Reyes Almeida | issue/deliver testimony of 18/05/2021, 15/10/2021 and 26/01/2022 with expression of finality | copy contains notation "NOTIFICADO 17/02/2022 ABOGADO LUIS MIGUEL LÓPEZ GÓMEZ"; complete service matrix still required | use in 2022 title/notarial/registry chain must be proven document-by-document | VERIFIED/PARTIAL |

## Formal supervisory activation — 15 August 2026

The unresolved retrieval questions above have now been formally placed before three relevant LAJ supervisory/coordination levels using the **same evidential corpus** and separate, cross-referenced REGAGE registrations:

| Sequence | Recipient | DIR3 | REGAGE | Time presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Secretaría de Gobierno · Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias | `J00023418` | `REGAGE26e00073341191` | 19:53:57 |
| 2 | Secretaría de Coordinación Provincial de Las Palmas | `J00022837` | `REGAGE26e00073341382` | 20:00:15 |
| 3 | Secretaría General para la Innovación y Calidad del Servicio Público de Justicia | `E05077001` | `REGAGE26e00073341477` | 20:04:00 |

All three receipts identify the attached file `LAJ_TSJ_Canarias_15AGO2026.pdf` with the same SHA-512:

`d249c5d34600305d78b555f0e2ba445ebcd5bc0a98cb6313e040f80691477227d2cb4d62379bf8f195ff45ed0f6e762f07fe12455234a3faded4218c5c39f685`

This changes the status of the ledger from a purely internal retrieval list to a formally activated supervisory evidence request. It does **not** establish that a preliminary inquiry or disciplinary proceeding has been opened.

See `archive/LAJ_SUPERVISORY_CHAIN_15AUG2026.md` for the controlling registration record.

## Required next retrieval / response monitoring
1. Actual testimony PDFs/certified copies issued, not only DIORs.
2. Complete ATLANTE/LexNET service logs for each act.
3. Request writings 6611/18, 7336/2021 and 820/2022 with stated purpose/annexes.
4. Notarial and Registry instruments identifying which judicial testimony was relied on.
5. Parallel LPB/Aweswell request ledger: request date, response, delay, grant/refusal/redirection and service.
6. Any acknowledgement, internal reference, referral, report request, preservation measure, preliminary-inquiry decision or express archive from J00023418, J00022837 or E05077001.

## Publication rule
Do not use "clandestine" unless intentional concealment is independently evidenced. Safe formulation: "no notification located in the reviewed corpus" or "notification/service chain remains to be reconstructed".

Do not convert registration into investigation. Use the exact procedural state: `registered`, `referred`, `report requested`, `preliminary inquiry opened`, `disciplinary proceeding opened`, `archived` or `resolved`, as supported by primary documents.